Rittenhouse

[One Brow]

Only one side is writing the books on race, one side buying books about race, one side pushing race education into school. It is the same side that Richard Spencer, who voted straight democrat in the last election, is on. The United States has a stain of racism on its past. The problem was the racism, but one side seems to be pretending the racism was fine but they just had the races in the wrong order.

I would be angry about the blatant misrepresentation, except you are showing such profound ignorance about so many things (starting with what books are being written), it would be like being angry with a baby for pooping outside a diaper.

 

[Dkeaton024]

How do you know that with such assurance?

Because I have seen no solid evidence that he is a white supremacist and you're going to have to prove to me he is. Screaming white supremacy at every single thing doesn't make it so. Now the Ahmaud Arbery case is one that much better fits and I am awaiting the verdict in that trial.

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

How do you know that with such assurance?

How do you know that with such assurance?

You don’t, but at this time there’s no evidence that he is. I’m sure lots of people have scoured social media for even just one slip up.

Agreed. He's still a dumbass, but I figured he would not be convicted of anything he was charged with.

I didn’t pay any attention to the case till he was found not guilty. I recall hearing about him killing two and wounding one other and hearing he was a white suprematist from reports on tv. I guess some news outlets will be paying the price for that. The other day I YouTubed his cross examination. It felt like a police interrogation as if the offeicer doing the questioning was trying to get the person in question to slip up or pressure him into saying something that would incriminate himself. The prosecution was horribly bad.

 

[Avery]

People already saying the tragedy tonight in Wisconsin during the parade is payback for Rittenhouse when they don’t even have a clue. Let’s get some facts first.

Twitter is a cesspool.

 

[Safetydan]

@LogGrad98 take is obviously correct. Also, the leftist-blaming rhetoric is stupid af.

 

[One Brow]

Because I have seen no solid evidence that he is a white supremacist and you're going to have to prove to me he is.

I don't think I need to prove anything to you, and short of getting a membership role, I doubt you'd believe it anyhow. I was curious how you were so sure, but it seems it was just a debate tactic as opposed to being actual knowledge. Thanks for making it so clear that's how you act in these discussions.

Screaming white supremacy at every single thing doesn't make it so.

Very true, and denying it does not make it false. So far, the only evidence I've seen is that he's comfortable with white sumpremacists.

Now the Ahmaud Arbery case is one that much better fits and I am awaiting the verdict in that trial.

It seems more clear there, I agree.

 

[One Brow]

You don’t, but at this time there’s no evidence that he is.

There's that one picture with a couple of other supremacists, but they could just be supporters that he didn't know.

 

[Gameface]

@LogGrad98 take is obviously correct. Also, the leftist-blaming rhetoric is stupid af.

Yeah it's kind of hilarious considering the direction the "right" has gone with Trumpism.

They all like "You're calling racism racism and you expect my support?"

Meanwhile look at a ****ing Trump rally and ask yourself if you're convincing me to vote Republican.

I don't want to be on the same team as people who get turned off when racism is acknowledged and addressed. I don't know why they think "we" are trying to get them on our side. I certainly don't want them on my side. They can **** right the **** off as far as I'm concerned. We might not make them irrelevant today, but they WILL become irrelevant. So they can be stubborn little children until they die as far as I'm concerned.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Twitter is a cesspool.

True but it is also crazy fast.
[deleted because I don't want to give this dirtbag any publicity]

At first appearance this doesn't seem to have anything to do with Rittenhouse. The guy's social media isn't political but he does seem to have an obsessive love for Kobe Bryant. I only found 1 tweet that was even sort of political and it had more to do with Kanye than any political tribe. There was nothing about Rittenhouse, or BLM, or anything divisive in his social media.

 

[fishonjazz]

So you are saying that 1) we need citizens to assume the mantle of the police at their whim to maintain law and order, and 2) that angry white men are not responsible for most mass shootings in this country. Interesting take. Seems you want the wild west. I am glad we live in a society where you would not be making the rules.

So yes he was ambushed. Ok. If he hadn't been there at all, or hadn't had a gun, would anyone have felt they had a reason to ambush him? You are acting as if his choice to be a vigilante is fully reasonable and justified, and that he was the only one capable of being a vigilante.

Here is another way to look at it. Rosenbaum went there to stop shooters from attacking the protesters, with a plan to take out any bad guys by any means necessary, you know, as a vigilante. So he sees a kid brandishing a gun, an obvious gun, waving it around out in the open, like those used in mass shootings. He devises a plan to stop this dangerous shooter, since someone needs to maintain law and order, as you said. So he determines the best way to do this while being as safe for himself as possible, and he "ambushes" him, intent on stopping the guy with the gun, and not believing him while he yelled at him that he was a friendly, I mean that is what the bad guy would say, right? So he tries to stop him and the bad guy, the active shooter, shoots him. Who is the vigilante here?

You act like since Rittenhouse went there with a gun he was automatically authorized by the police to meet out both sentence and execution on any situation he deems to be dangerous that needs to be taken care of. This is so ridiculous it is mindboggling anyone could put that forward as a reasonable response. We do not live in the wild west. We do not live in a third world country where it is bouncing between tin-pot dictators. We live in an actual country with rule of law and law enforcement personnel and everything. We have no need of vigilantes.

It is hard to believe we have to state this stuff to adult human beings. Scares the **** out of me for where we are heading as a country. Which president will be the one fiddling while Washington burns?



Edit: the plinking argument is one of the worst excuses I have ever heard. So he innocently took a gun to the protest, not to hunt anyone down but because he got lost on the huge tract of land and had to find some cans to plink somewhere? Wow, the leaps in logic are astounding.

He was just there to visit a friend. Nothing more. Lol


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[fishonjazz]

Seriously shut the **** up with this nonsense. NO ONE REASONABLE BUYS YOUR ********. No one made the assertion that guns made things less dangerous, least of all me. The protest was not peaceful and go **** yourself if you think you’re going to use that nonsense talking point. It and other protests were NOT peaceful long before Rittenhouse showed up. And yes, other people died across the country due to that violence.

Now go with the “it’s just property” BS. Go ahead use the talking point. Everyone saw what happened. Leftists are so much more like right wing crazies than they’d ever have the dignity to look in the mirror and see.

Rittenhouse was just there to visit a friend and was ambushed by satan worshipping murderous baby rapers. Luckily there was a gun laying on the ground nearby and he was able to kill the people participating in the purge and save the day.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Avery]

True but it is also crazy fast.
[deleted because I don't want to give this dirtbag any publicity]

At first appearance this doesn't seem to have anything to do with Rittenhouse. The guy's social media isn't political but he does seem to have an obsessive love for Kobe Bryant. I only found 1 tweet that was even sort of political and it had more to do with Kanye than any political tribe. There was nothing about Rittenhouse, or BLM, or anything divisive in his social media.

Yeah, I saw his awful rap video. Even the car was in it which is surreal.

I don’t know what this guy’s motive was or what he was on, but it’s guys like him why I support the death penalty. I just wish it didn’t take 20 years.

Hope he rides the lightning.