He was on something... like I said. He took two tasers and didn't make it to the ground.
Wow, you're a delight and a joy read.
He was on something... like I said. He took two tasers and didn't make it to the ground.
Don't believe the taser was around in 91. Probably a stun gun which was just pain compliance.
If I were to guess at the reason for the OP, I would suggest a Colbertity.
Via WikipediaNow, let's not confuse The Joker with a bunch of facts, especially since facts have such a liberal bias anyhow.
If I were to guess at the reason for the OP, I would suggest a Colbertity.
Use of the Taser
Sergeant Koon then ordered the officers to "stand clear". King was standing and was not responding to Koon's commands. Koon then fired a Taser into King's back. King groaned; momentarily fell to the ground; then stood back up. Koon fired the Taser again, knocking King to the ground.[10] Powell's arrest report states that the Taser "temporarily halt[ed] deft's [King's] attack", and Solano stated that the Taser appeared to affect King at first because "the suspect shook and yelled for almost five seconds".[13]
There aint but a few posters on this board who care to discuss anything serious, eh? Mainly they just prefer to talk about the last movie or TV show they seen. Or other posters, of course. That's always popular.
carolinaJazz said:Rodney King DESERVED that beating!
You sack of ****
Always a surefire way to make enduring friendships
I am The Joker... take the name and ego to heart
I do appreciate positive rep though.
...starting threads the same day in which you not so subtlely compare the moderators to the Los Angeles police department is probably not the best opening salvo.
Or you could just make points that aren't in riddles and you'll never be misconstrued.