What's new

Romney Fundraiser - Secret Taping

Romney has said he was wrong, and I respect him for acknowledging it.

Fair point, although it is interesting to see the theme of the week continues to be "ignore everything I said when I was trying to win the primary."

Where's Santorum with his etch-a-sketches?
 
Romney has said he was wrong, and I respect him for acknowledging it.

What are his motives for his admission? For all of his flip flops?

That's the issue.

anti_mitt_romney_flip_flops_pancakes_waffles_button-p145390000147411013en8go_400.jpg


A few months ago when this was filmed, he was a tea party nutcake. The other night, he was a moderate.

What will he be in the White House? And what happens if he wants to pass some moderate legislation and the tea party obstructionists oppose?
 
Define poor. Is it the woman in line at DWS trying to renew her food stamps? Good thing she has her iphone to keep her company. As for old...well when our generation is old we will still be electronically savy. Or do we suddenly revert to letter writing once we turn 60? That is some fine print for you.

Also I deal with elderly people every day. Some are certainly clueless when it comes to computers but some are certainly capable with technology.

Enough the with lady on food stamps that has an iphone. Every single income bracket has gross examples of how we overspend. It's not a food stamp thing. It's a problem with our society.
Of course there are people that blow their money. Shame on them. We should make the qualifications a little tougher, and drug test people. However, how people spend their money is on them.

Isn't a computer more important than a TV in society nowadays anyway?
 
You missed the whole point of that response. It was not about mis using the funds at all. It was about our society becoming more and more tech savy.

Candrew said something along the lines of "except the elderly and poor". I deal with those specific groups all day. Every single one of those poor people have a cell ( usually a smart phone) and know how to use it.

As for the elderly some of them are tech illiterate. Granted. But that number is rapidly dwindling. The younger generations are much more tech savy and they are replacing that older generation.

Good job on trying to lambast me for something I was not even talking about though.

I very much support the drug testing for entitlement to things like unemployment though
 
You missed the whole point of that response. It was not about mis using the funds at all. It was about our society becoming more and more tech savy.

Candrew said something along the lines of "except the elderly and poor". I deal with those specific groups all day. Every single one of those poor people have a cell ( usually a smart phone) and know how to use it.

As for the elderly some of them are tech illiterate. Granted. But that number is rapidly dwindling. The younger generations are much more tech savy and they are replacing that older generation.

Good job on trying to lambast me for something I was not even talking about though.

I very much support the drug testing for entitlement to things like unemployment though

I know I was off topic. Sorry for that. I found my slant much more interesting than what you guys were talking about.
Sorry to **** up the flow :cool:
 
Back
Top