NAOS
Well-Known Member
How do you manage to stuff so much detailed information into your posts?That's not whats going to prevent it.
How do you manage to stuff so much detailed information into your posts?That's not whats going to prevent it.
Beal is a step above guys like Harris or Middleton. We would never get someone like him through free agency, and they are rarely available through trades in fire sales.
I know we aren’t doing it. But I love the fit and would give up whatever it took to get him, he’s exactly what we need to take some of the scoring load. And we’d have him for awhile.
for sure.Side bar... we have a trade exception that we could just absorb Tomas Satoransky... If we got Otto I might try to get him too. I think he's really under-rated. There's some Joe Ingles diamond in the rough intrigue there for me.
I honestly think he's a step below, especially considering he's bit redundant to Mitchell.Beal is a step above guys like Harris or Middleton. We would never get someone like him through free agency, and they are rarely available through trades in fire sales.
I know we aren’t doing it. But I love the fit and would give up whatever it took to get him, he’s exactly what we need to take some of the scoring load. And we’d have him for awhile.
for sure.
I don’t see redundancy. I think they would fit great together. But I do think me and you don’t see Mitchell the same way in that kind of role. But I believe. And a 25 PPG deadeye to share the backcourt with him sounds like the perfect catalyst for Mitchell at the 1.I honestly think he's a step below, especially considering he's bit redundant to Mitchell.
He sort of would be, but I think it's everything outside of that that pays off... the spacing and the additional defensive pressure off both of them.I honestly think he's a step below, especially considering he's bit redundant to Mitchell.
YesIf we land Otto Porter, how does that affect the starting lineup, or does OP start at the 4?