What's new

Roy Moore justifications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
I don't care what "the left" has done in this context. Same for "the right". It matters what Moore and Jones have done. One has multiple accusation and 1 doesn't. But all that matters is red/blue. SMH
we don't know what both have done! acquisitions multiple or not do not equal a guilty plea. but court of public opinion is different than a real live court. every person of the public may have its own burden of proof
 
So much projection in this post it’s hard to know where to begin. Think back for a moment on just a fraction of the labels you’ve put on people: Marxist, socialist, fascist, moron, idiot, fool. But now a childish label like “turds" is somehow too much and worthy of moderation?

Yes, indeed. I used to think you were smart, but I am proven wrong by this lame moronic imbecility.

"turd" is a filthy demeaning characterization of a human being that is just repulsive, even if it is true that most of us have some in process.

However, "Marxist" is an objectively defined set of political/historical/economic notions which can be found in a book called "Das Kapital". socialist, fascist, moron, idiot, and fool all have pretty well-established descriptive terms. I don't think any of them are particularly demeaning, just useful in reference to some of the things we think or do.

To the point, humans can be these and retain their essential value as human beings. The words do not strip others of their humanity.

The word "turd" does, I believe.
 
Yes, indeed. I used to think you were smart, but I am proven wrong by this lame moronic imbecility.

"turd" is a filthy demeaning characterization of a human being that is just repulsive, even if it is true that most of us have some in process.

However, "Marxist" is an objectively defined set of political/historical/economic notions which can be found in a book called "Das Kapital". socialist, fascist, moron, idiot, and fool all have pretty well-established descriptive terms. I don't think any of them are particularly demeaning, just useful in reference to some of the things we think or do.

To the point, humans can be these and retain their essential value as human beings. The words do not strip others of their humanity.

The word "turd" does, I believe.
 
Yes, indeed. I used to think you were smart, but I am proven wrong by this lame moronic imbecility.

"turd" is a filthy demeaning characterization of a human being that is just repulsive, even if it is true that most of us have some in process.

However, "Marxist" is an objectively defined set of political/historical/economic notions which can be found in a book called "Das Kapital". socialist, fascist, moron, idiot, and fool all have pretty well-established descriptive terms. I don't think any of them are particularly demeaning, just useful in reference to some of the things we think or do.

To the point, humans can be these and retain their essential value as human beings. The words do not strip others of their humanity.

The word "turd" does, I believe.

I love how just recently you posted about insults and tried to stake out the moral high ground for yourself. Then you follow up with this beauty. You're down in the gutters with everyone else.
 
some right wingers perfer a sexual predator over a socilaist. after all sociliast govenrment have done the most damage throu
I love how just recently you posted about insults and tried to stake out the moral high ground for yourself. Then you follow up with this beauty. You're down in the gutters with everyone else.
I would chose a sexual predator above a national, democratic or whatever socialist! as they always do much worse then rape a few women!

of course i never voted and never will! but when it comes to evils like someone will cut off all my limbs or just 1 limb i hope just 1 gets cut off!
 
Any famous man who has harassed or assaulted women should probably be keeping their mouths shut about now.

Geraldo Rivera apologizing for his series of tweets stating how sexual assault should be proved.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...criminalize-courtship/?utm_term=.a22f8f8ee81c

Bette Midler mentioned being assaulted by Rivera in a Barbara Walters interview in 1991. At the time it was not a scandal, just a part of a woman's life. This reminds me of how much the world is changing for the better on this issue.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/cel...walters/ar-BBFWLTP?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

People are panicking and trying to "stay ahead of the narrative". Kind of like we tried to teach our kids, better to admit to a mistake than be caught trying to cover one up.
 
RNC just went all in on Moore. He is now getting funding and endorsements. Leading in the polls... looks like he will win the seat.
 
RNC just went all in on Moore. He is now getting funding and endorsements. Leading in the polls... looks like he will win the seat.
are the acquisitions proven? their has been enough doubt cast by the right (leaning) media, and those people who listne to the right leaning media dont trust the "fake news networks!"

so yeah! i can find 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 people to acquise any one of something. acquisations mean jack ****! especially when the evidence they brought up seems suspect


disclaimer: i am not saying he did or did not do it, i do not know. but acquisations mean jack ****!
 
RNC just went all in on Moore. He is now getting funding and endorsements. Leading in the polls... looks like he will win the seat.

Yep, better a sexual abuser than a liberal.

Thanks Alabama!
 
I love how just recently you posted about insults and tried to stake out the moral high ground for yourself. Then you follow up with this beauty. You're down in the gutters with everyone else.

nope.

the "progressives", self-styled political activists are determined principled liars. Practically every word in their rhetoric is used to claim some virtue or appearance of good where the truth is the opposite. Varnished evil, whatever spin anyone tries to put on it, is evil.

When the "progressives" who used the word "turd" above.... and some who used it might imagine they are even conservatives or whatever, I know.... use that word it is part of a systematic dehumanization of people. It is at the least bullying.

We know that every human occurrence of genocide, and every lesser degree of denial of human rights, is justified by the perpetrators with rhetoric, labels, slurs, or whatever useful hate/dismissal/degradation there is that promises to effectively justify the actions of one group, believing themselves the betters, against other groups whom they characterize as less somehow. And yah, the word "evil" comes into play.

It is the process of objectification of sexuality that justifies doing abusive things to others in that department.

It is the process of dehumanization that justifies genocide, and many other abuses.

Many humans are Marxist believers, or socialists or any number of other political identities. A lot of people do stuff we can call "evil" for whatever reason, and a lot of people occasionally ponder their actions or words and feel they have been foolish, or even moronic. Even imbecility is virtually a universal element of life for all humans. The words have fair use in describing specific things about other JFC members.

But calling anyone a "turd" is off the scale objectification/dehumanization towards the person so called..

I used to like some of the stuff you write, and maybe still do sometimes. But I think becoming a "mod" stultifies members in here.

It's like all the mods, except Moe, have undergone a special course in re-education along common core lines to make sure you can no longer actually think.

Well, everyone can have a point of view or opinion. But nobody, not even a US president, is a "turd". So why is our self-professing "liberals" are going so hard on the track of Hitler rhetorically?

Propaganda through the ages has always reduced to the simplistic formula "Us good, them bad" just before the deplorables are rounded up and shot and bulldozed into the trenches.
 
Back
Top