What's new

Sanders is much better than Hayward

13 pts, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists in 20 minutes would be pretty fantastic production. Throw in a steal and a half a block and you've got a translated PER of like 20. If Hayward puts up anything close to that, I'll be pretty ecstatic with the pick.

The 13/4/2 prediction and the 20-minute prediction were two separate thoughts, I think. Rookie year: 20 minutes per game. At his best (career-wise): 13/4/2.
 
In his rookie year Hayward will be lucky to see the floor. To play as rookie for Sloan you have to be able to play defense i.e. Mathews. Hayward's biggest weakness is his defense.

P.... Rex was right when he said I meant the best he'll ever do in the NBA. I will say this about Hayward as I try to look at the positive side he was much more physical than I thought. He banged well with the big guys under the basket.
 
Shandon Anderson wasn't very good at defense and he played a lot as a rookie.. Only looked like he did because he backed up Jeff Hornacek.
 
The *real* Larry Sanders:

Garry_Shandling_at_the_39th_Emmy_Awards_cropped.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sirkickyass is right. I had nothing to do with changing people's minds about Hayward. Almost nobody else liked him as a prospect or liked the pick when I was tooting his horn. The only reason people are coming around on him is because people are talking themselves into liking the pick. Let's just hope that I was right about him being a very good NBA player, eh?
 
Last edited:
Sirkickyass is right. I had nothign to do with changing people's minds about Hayward. Almost nobody else liked his as a prospect or liked the pick when I was tooting his horn. The only reason people are coming around on him is because people are talking themselves into liking the pick. Let's just hope that I was right about him being a very good NBA player, eh?

I just like him because he preaches the truth.
 
Since my first post went over so well I thought I try another. Hayward at best is a bench role player that might get the Jazz 20 minutes and at his best get 13 pts, 4 rbs, 2 assits a game. He probably wont last 10 years in the league. Larry Sanders a big, long armed, blocking machine should have been the pick.

I just want to ask how Honz (obviously a Jazz P.R. member hired to change people minds or Hayward's brother) has been so successful convincing everyone that the Jazz made a great choice.

Rip away.

No offense OP, I was just being sarcastic in the other thread. But Sanders isn't better at this point than Elder Hayward. I measure a players' success on par with how their team does and how many games they win. Hayward single-handedly lead his team to the National Final last year, where as Sanders did not make the Tournament. That has a lot to do in my mind of how good a player is.
 
P...Rex

Wow borderline allstar. I have to respectfully disagree I watched and recorded every summer league game. He was not agressive and didn't shoot that well. He got a lot of his points shooting free throws and the end of games. He was not at all impressive. His defense will be his biggest weakness. He does not have the lateral movement to stay with Paul George let alone the kobe's of this word. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think so.
Better watch those games again, son.
Hayward shot 62% from the field (13-21). And he was very aggressive going after rebounds and loose balls. With Sundiata "Ballhog" Gaines, it's a wonder anyone else got any touches. Hayward had ONE bad game. IMO, Gordon was one of the few looking to run any semblance of the Jazz system, coming out to take the ball, passing it quickly, then running over to his spot on the floor.

If by lack of aggression you mean that Gordon didn't chuck up a bunch of shots, then he's guilty as charged. He pretty much only took open shots. But isn't that EXACTLY what we want our players to do? There's a reason Utah is always near the top of the league in terms of FG%. The Jazz try to get the ball inside FIRST, and the wings either cut to the hoop or take high-percentage shots coming off screens.

Granted, he doesn't appear to have great range from the three. But he was deadly coming off the curl. And he has some moves to/around the hoop. He needs to work on his driving skills - at times he was a little out of control. But is any rookie a finished product? Just watch some footage of Turner or Favors. They were terrible.

BTW, our poster boy of last season, Wesley Matthews, shot 35% in summer league. He was a guy who was borderline to be INVITED to training camp.
 
Last edited:
I think honz didn't succeed in convincing everyone as much as the sheer prospect of hope has changed the tune of many on the board. The attitude seems to be "if he was the wrong choice, well now he's my wrong choice so I might as well hope for the best."

I can't go back in time and change KOC's pick no matter how much I disagree with it. I can only hope that it turns out I'm wrong, and if that's the case I'll happily eat that crow. Don't mistake hope for validation of honz oldtimer. You know he's ready to crap the bed and change his username if it turns out Hayward looks overmatched the first month of the season.

Way to hedge your bet there pal.
 
Many people were upset with the Hayward pick because this team was void of talent at the 4 and 5. Now that we're deeper into the offseason, the Jazz have Jefferson and I think that makes the pick of Hayward much, much different than it initially was on draft day to most people. KOC was smart enough to realize that all of the "bigs" available at 9 were projects. A big man can take 3 to 4 years to develop in the NBA if they even develop at all. It would have been awful to see KOC draft a big man who wouldn't be ready for a while and see Deron leave in the meantime.

Instead, KOC drafted what he believed was the best player available and ended up securing an already established NBA big man who's still only 25 years old. Add to that, I think Hayward will see a certain amount of success as a rookie. Initially, I think he'll get the minutes vacated by Korver. I think from the get-go Haywards all around game is going to be better than Korver at his best. This will endear him to Jerry and more minutes will follow.
 
Since my first post went over so well I thought I try another. Hayward at best is a bench role player that might get the Jazz 20 minutes and at his best get 13 pts, 4 rbs, 2 assits a game. He probably wont last 10 years in the league. Larry Sanders a big, long armed, blocking machine should have been the pick.

I just want to ask how Honz (obviously a Jazz P.R. member hired to change people minds or Hayward's brother) has been so successful convincing everyone that the Jazz made a great choice.

Rip away.

I like your style.

~rubs chin~

Really. I like your style.
 
Back
Top