And yet the world goes on progressing regardless of this type of boogyman fear syndrome.
Can we get a candidate who wouldn't stand in the way of progress (economic AND social), while simultaneously not bomb people/topple regimes to achieve political objectives?
I think if we get Sanders and cut our defense spending way back, it will be interesting to see how it impacts other countries. Wars, terrorism, etc, it's not just going to go away. Other countries would have to spend more. Realistically, we should pull back a ton of our foreign support no matter who the president is...we shouldn't be policing the world.
I agreeI think if we get Sanders and cut our defense spending way back, it will be interesting to see how it impacts other countries. Wars, terrorism, etc, it's not just going to go away. Other countries would have to spend more. Realistically, we should pull back a ton of our foreign support no matter who the president is...we shouldn't be policing the world.
This too, I thinkOur defense spending is a big reason why there's so much terrorism.
I guess not everyone bases there entire world view on how much it costs to put gas in the tank.
I'm not saying the ptb rig the elections, they just pick the candidates, and steer the talking points. So when the democrats fielded only two candidates and one of them was hillary and the other one makes hillary look Smart, Religous, and moderate...I am suspicious.
I am similarly suspicious when the republicans field a dozen candidates, but the front runner is a lifelong democrat who decided to run as a republican while behaving like a characterture of a republican as depicted by Democrats appealing to the people's fears.
The candidates around hillary make hillary seem like a good choice.
I lean right on most issues. That's not the reason I have a problem with Cruz, Trump and Clinton. I think Clinton is a narcissistic liar. I think Trump is an egotistical power hungry idiot. I think Cruz is an accident waiting to happen. The candidate that I feel best about in this election cycle is Kasich. I am trying to learn more about him. He strikes me as an honest man who is sincerely interested in working with both sides in order to accomplish things.Yeah, I remember the good ole days under Dubya when it cost me 50 bucks to fill up the tank on my 4 cylinder Honda accord. Good times. I can understand people complaining about certain things Obama has done as president, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would suggest that overall, things are worse now than they were under the last republican president. I don't see the GOP supplying anyone that would be a superior leader than what the dems have to offer. FWIW, I don't belong to either party, and although I lean left on more issues than not, I see problems on both sides and am suspicious of those who seem to defend/support either side unconditionally.
We are better off with good leaders. I was playing off the "Republican party will be done for" in the post I was responding to, though, so my statement probably does sound a bit more extreme than I feel.And yet the world goes on progressing regardless of this type of boogyman fear syndrome.
who is sincerely interested in working with both sides in order to accomplish things.