Because a George Hill probably wouldn't move the neddle against a team like the Rockets. And maybe the front office thought Royce was a better player than Crowder, who remember, shoot barely above 30% on 3s.Why couldn’t we have both if we sign a George Hill for example, instead of Conley?
Have you been watching the Heat? He’s killin it for them D’ing up Giannis.Because a George Hill probably wouldn't move the neddle against a team like the Rockets. And maybe the front office thought Royce was a better player than Crowder, who remember, shoot barely above 30% on 3s.
Clarkson is worth 12 a yearOffer Clarkson 3/30. If he doesn’t take it, let someone else have him.
Ideal offseason
Conley agrees to a lesser deal
Allows us to re-sign Clarkson, bring back Favors
Jazz move Davis, bring in defensive minded veteran
Jazz draft size/length to bolster the bench.
And we get Bogey back
Boom bitches
First, your balance between positives and negatives on Conley's game tonight. Yesterday, you agreed on a post that said he is a net negative if he scores 20ppg but doesn't give you 7-10 assists per game or at least 2 steals. Then you compared him to a player like Bertrans.what was the question?
Well, the guy was a moron and wasted his money going to those universities. Also, your employer probably had some bad HR.I worked with a guy that went to both Harvard and MIT. First day he was confronted by 8 employees at once he had a meltdown. Ended up slapping a woman. He also couldn't do excel to save his life and never could understand array formulas. But he was too smart for all of us, reminded us daily he was smart. Talked about his degrees from Harvard and MIT. Believe me, you have us all very very very very very...very...very............very impressed.
First, your balance between positives and negatives on Conley's game tonight. Yesterday, you agreed on a post that said he shouldn't be playing if he scores 20ppg but doesn't give you 7-10 assists per game or at least 2 steals. Then you compared him to a player like Bertrans.
Tonight he had a different game. He shot the ball poorly but was much better on defense, passing, rebounding and loose balls (hey! he even got 3 steals). Yet, you fail to aknowledge those and in turn, contradict the argument you made yesterday.
So, what is it?
Oh yeah, and Jeff Green. But I'm explaining the FO rationale. We had him for two years and he didn't produce at that level. And he had plenty of open looks in our offense. In that light I understand why the FO saw him as expendable.Have you been watching the Heat? He’s killin it for them D’ing up Giannis.
Yeah. I mean I obviously wanted the Jazz to win. But I'm not devastated. I didn't give them a shot in the next series.This loss stings a little less knowing how flawed both teams are. Our bench is pretty awful and would be completely dominated by the Clippers.
For a guy six foot nothin past his prime when our shooting guard is undersized to begin with?Oh yeah, and Jeff Green. But I'm explaining the FO rationale. We had him for two years and he didn't produce at that level. And he had plenty of open looks in our offense. In that light I understand why the FO saw him as expendable.