Favors Flave
Well-Known Member
Still waiting for worse starting SGs in the league? We proved Delfino>>Bell
So CY
- Thread starter Favors Flave
- Start date
It would be easier if you just made it worse startings wings so I don't have to go through and meticulously find out who a teams starting SG is. Then find out that players is their half-time starting SG, sometimes a SF, so I will get debated on the fact they aren't always a SG like Raja.
1. https://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3196/daequan-cook
Is listed as their starting SG. He is pretty bad.
Known as a sharp shooter, but only shoots 36% and 33% from the field and deep respectively.
Is listed as their starting SG. He is pretty bad.
Known as a sharp shooter, but only shoots 36% and 33% from the field and deep respectively.
2. https://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3190/marco-belinelli
Marco Bellineli. I know his stats are larger in points, but he also plays more minutes and is asked to do more on a really bad Hornets team. Terrible defender. I've seen him plenty of times and I personally call him the Italian CJ Miles.
Marco Bellineli. I know his stats are larger in points, but he also plays more minutes and is asked to do more on a really bad Hornets team. Terrible defender. I've seen him plenty of times and I personally call him the Italian CJ Miles.
Favors Flave
Well-Known Member
He's only starting cause Thabo is hurt. Plus he is only getting around 15 mins when starting
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
His last 5 games he's averaged 13.6 mpg, I would hardly consider that starting.
3. https://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/1999/carlos-delfino
Carlos Delfino. As stated before, he has essentially started 45% of his games at SG, the rest at SF. I always thought he was a SG, but I guess that is up for interpretation. Someone pointed out in the chatbox that he is better because he does more, but that is because he plays more minutes and has a larger role on the team. I would rather have Bell as our starter, but I realized why some may disagree.
Carlos Delfino. As stated before, he has essentially started 45% of his games at SG, the rest at SF. I always thought he was a SG, but I guess that is up for interpretation. Someone pointed out in the chatbox that he is better because he does more, but that is because he plays more minutes and has a larger role on the team. I would rather have Bell as our starter, but I realized why some may disagree.
The question is starters. Don't be a dick about this. I was given clear rules.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
But would you really take the 35 year old Bell over the 25 year old Bellinelli?
Favors Flave
Well-Known Member
Not valid either. CJ>Bell, therefore Bellinelli>Bell. Once again adds more value than Bell
jope
Well-Known Member
I think I agree on this one.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
I won't be a dick if you start being right every now and then. Plus if you really think James Harden isn't technically a starter on that team, you're dumber than I previously thought.
Clearly a lot of this is subject to opinion.
Technically the starter? I think to be technically the starter you have to be in the starting lineup.
4. https://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/635/anthony-parker
Anthony Parker. Probably the most similar player to Bell, so it makes for an easy comparison. Both are 5th options, over their prime, and aren't asked to do much.
Anthony Parker. Probably the most similar player to Bell, so it makes for an easy comparison. Both are 5th options, over their prime, and aren't asked to do much.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
Cook averages 13 mpg and "starts". Harden averages 31 mpg and comes off the bench. I think we all know who the "starting" SG is though, I mean, c'mon Cy.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
I'll give you this one, they are pretty even players. Neither one does anything.