What's new
By:

So gay!!!

Beantown said:
I am married and if I was married to one of my guy freinds instead of my wife then my life would be entirely different.

-I would not have my daughter nor would having offspring be an option. There's this thing called adoption.
-How I have sex would be totally opposite. So? You've never tried other entries? It feels pretty much the same.
-Living with a woman is complete opposite of living with a male roomate I think they're okay with having a same sex roommate since ya know, they want to marry the person and all. But thanks for your concern.
-I would not argue about me watching too much sports
-etc etc etc Sounds like your woman's lame and you should consider divorce.

Me being married to a man would litereally make my life do a full 180. I dont know how that is a shock or a surprise for people.
Click to expand...
You sound like you could use a 180. Seriously. Once you go ***, you never go back. Okay, well that's not true. You're always going back really.
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
You sound like you could use a 180. Seriously. Once you go ***, you never go back. Okay, well that's not true. You're always going back really. Backdoor.
Click to expand...

Didn't take long for this here thread to degenerate into homosexuals advocatin the "gay life" and lookin for converts, eh?
 
Beantown said:
If this "brain biology" grows and turns everybody gay then we are literally talking about the end of the world. No matter how you dice it, homosexuality does not fit into evolution.
Click to expand...

I say this out of love. Please have no more children. Seriously, hate breeds hate.
 
This evolutionary argument is hilarious.

Beantown says homosexuality is evolutionary inferior...

Why haven't homosexuals in humans (and many other animal species) died off millions of years ago, shouldn't they have been eradicated from the gene pool?

Beantown says that if only homosexuals were left, we would all die due to being unable to procreate.

Since when did homosexuals lack the ability to procreate? from what I've heard from my gay friends, surprisingly enough, they still can.
 
H.E. Pennypacker said:
I'm not the brightest when it comes to politics, but I'm pretty sure American democracy isn't mob rule. We have the constitution to protect the rights of minorities. And Prop 8 was unconstitutional. The majority shouldn't be able to oppress the minority just because they have more people (just like racial segregation).
Click to expand...

You're using a broad brush to try and make your point. I'm not for "mob rule" as you'd like to make it sound. I'm simply for the voice of the people being heard and upheld. I don't think that people who are pro-gay marrige in Cali are upset about "majority rules", they're upset because the majority didn't agree with them this time. If Prop 8 had failed, you'd hear ever supporter screaming from the rooftops about how the people had spoken. Funny how that works.

Under your line of thinking, why put anything to a vote of the people? Do you honestly believe that the old men in suits and the judges in Washington D.C. are the right people to make these type of decisions day in and day out? I'm sorry, but I do not. I feel that the American people would do a wonderful job of governing themselves if big government would get out of our way and let us do just that.
 
jazzman12 said:
You're using a broad brush to try and make your point. I'm not for "mob rule" as you'd like to make it sound. I'm simply for the voice of the people being heard and upheld. I don't think that people who are pro-gay marrige in Cali are upset about "majority rules", they're upset because the majority didn't agree with them this time. If Prop 8 had failed, you'd hear ever supporter screaming from the rooftops about how the people had spoken. Funny how that works.

Under your line of thinking, why put anything to a vote of the people? Do you honestly believe that the old men in suits and the judges in Washington D.C. are the right people to make these type of decisions day in and day out? I'm sorry, but I do not. I feel that the American people would do a wonderful job of governing themselves if big government would get out of our way and let us do just that.
Click to expand...

I dunno. When something like this interferes with the rights of minorities, I think people should absolutely be ignored and the constitution needs to take over. It is the role of the judiciary to deem whether laws are constitutional or not. In this case, Prop 8 wasn't, and it was struck down. If the rights of minorities were up for debate, chaos would ensue, and discrimination against women and blacks would be legal.
 
jazzman12 said:
You're using a broad brush to try and make your point. I'm not for "mob rule" as you'd like to make it sound. I'm simply for the voice of the people being heard and upheld. I don't think that people who are pro-gay marrige in Cali are upset about "majority rules", they're upset because the majority didn't agree with them this time. If Prop 8 had failed, you'd hear ever supporter screaming from the rooftops about how the people had spoken. Funny how that works.

Under your line of thinking, why put anything to a vote of the people? Do you honestly believe that the old men in suits and the judges in Washington D.C. are the right people to make these type of decisions day in and day out? I'm sorry, but I do not. I feel that the American people would do a wonderful job of governing themselves if big government would get out of our way and let us do just that.
Click to expand...

Did you stop reading after 'mob rule?' Read the part after that. He answered your question.
 
You're using a broad brush to try and make your point. I'm not for "mob rule" as you'd like to make it sound. I'm simply for the voice of the people being heard and upheld. I don't think that people who are against poll taxes in Mississippi are upset about "majority rules", they're upset because the majority didn't agree with them this time. If poll taxes hadn't passed, you'd hear every equal rights advocate screaming from the rooftops about how the people had spoken. Funny how that works.

Under your line of thinking, why put anything to a vote of the people? Do you honestly believe that the old men in suits and the judges in Washington D.C. are the right people to make these type of decisions day in and day out? I'm sorry, but I do not. I feel that the American people would do a wonderful job of governing themselves if big government would get out of our way and let us do just that.
 
Hopper said:
Anybuddy else gittin ads on they page with a picture of two guys standin nose-to-nose with crap-eatin grins on their faces and looks of lust in their eyes askin: "Is gay marriage wrong?"
Click to expand...

OMG I scrolled up and what do you know.

This ruling is terrible. Homosexuality undermines procreation. Then they will want to have their own families with adopted children. Can you imagine being raised by two mothers or two fathers? That must suck ***. Thankfully I was raised by a married mother and father and not brought into some screwed up situation whether it be this or some messed up divorced parents. Children are meant to be raised by their biological mother and father. Sucks for those of you who don't come from perfect families like I do.
 
Sloanfeld said:
OMG I scrolled up and what do you know.

This ruling is terrible. Homosexuality undermines procreation. Then they will want to have their own families with adopted children. Can you imagine being raised by two mothers or two fathers? That must suck ***. Thankfully I was raised by a married mother and father and not brought into some screwed up situation whether it be this or some messed up divorced parents. Children are meant to be raised by their biological mother and father. Sucks for those of you who don't come from perfect families like I do.
Click to expand...

I will say this is the rare instance where I have no idea if this is satire or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top