Broadcasters have a huge influence on public perceptions.
I made it to post 11 and I can't take the idiocy. One day you're going to think back on this thread and realize you are being a serious twit. Let's assume that every one of these guys has a career better than Harpring. Does that make Matt a bad guy for giving it everything he possibly could during his career? If you don't think he deserved to be on the team that's your prerogative, but if you were in his shoes and someone had been willing to pay you to play basketball I highly doubt you would have said, "No thanks, I'm not worthy," which is what you seem to be suggesting Harpring should have done. From my perspective he looked to be a guy who put it all out there, even to the extent of sacrificing his body and his future health for the good of his team. He believed that laying a hard foul on the opposition was the right way to play. Lots of people, including me, agree with his mantra of toughness. Maybe you should switch to watching Bonnet Ball.I don't know what is so difficult about this.
You guys keep wanting to talk about what Harpring did in his best year, and act like he did that every year in his career.
Are you seriously suggesting that Harping could rebound and defend the paint as rookie as well as Favors or Kanter, or pass and handle the ball as well as a rookie as Burks and Hayward?
Refs don't listen to broadcasters ether.
It's just odd that with all the favoritism the Jazz got from the refs, and all the support that Stockton and Malone got from great role players like Harpring, they couldn't win one championship during their entire careers. Something doesn't add up.
What a ridiculous thread.
That said, I wish he could just shut the hell up for a few minutes each broadcast. Silence is underrated.