We need to tamper and let Quickley's camp we're willing to go $100M+.
Are we willing to though? Seems a bit much for someone who disappeared in the playoffs.
We need to tamper and let Quickley's camp we're willing to go $100M+.
Are we willing to though? Seems a bit much for someone who disappeared in the playoffs.
I would, can't deny that his playoffs was disappointing though. I would try to capitalize on it rather than being spooked by it personally.
I bet we could get him for a lot cheaper than 25M per year though.
I believe all rookie extensions can go out 5 years now... I'd say 5/100-120 is fair and doable. You could also make it descend and be quite tradeable/cap friendly.IDK, maybe $20 M.....but if it costs a little more annual to get it done you do it. Upping the money helps convince Quickley and puts more pressure on NYK to cave.
So a deal could start at 27M a year and end at 19M a year in 5 years when the cap is 50% higher. Between that and renegotiate and extending Lauri and maybe JC if they want to get fancy could set us up pretty well capwise.I believe all rookie extensions can go out 5 years now... I'd say 5/100-120 is fair and doable. You could also make it descend and be quite tradeable/cap friendly.
Here is the deal... if Keyonte is a good starting pg... the absolute fastest that happens is like 2 years right? More likely its 2+ years. I just don't know that you bank on that happening real fast. Don't want to bury him but if he is competent as a solid backup for 15-20 minutes a night I will be happily surprised. It is more likely he is okay and shows flashes... then likely becomes solid as a backup in year 2... then there is another jump to take.I didn't read the entire thread. So is anyone seriously thinking Keyonte can be the starting PG? I saw some convo about that somewhere. He didn't do any play-making in college, did he? Why would we want to be pounding square pegs into round holes. Is DL secretly spreading this stuff around?