BTW, Islamic extremists can be modified into smart (relatively speaking) bombs. Pretty much a one time trick per extremist, because they are always destroyed in the process, but they can do a ton of damage (particularly when a 747 is involved). Should we ban those?
Most rapes and murders are done illegally. We should legalize rape and murder.
![]()
My point exactly.Many fishers an hunters poach illegally. We should ban fishing an hunting.
Many pet owners abuse or neglect there animals. We should outlaw dog an cat pets.
![]()
. The proposed laws would have had no impact in the case they are currently using to push for the laws (as usual).
Nobody proposed Australia like laws because they know there is not a chance they would go through. What did happen is that an Islamic terrorist attacked a nightclub with a gun. Instead of confronting the problem of Islamic terrorism they scrubbed his declaration of why he did what he did from the 911 transcript, then proposed legislation making it illegal for someone on the no-fly list to buy a gun. Guess what. This guy wasn't on the no-fly list. In other words the legislation would have no impact on the event that sparked it, except to deflect conversation from the actual problem.It made huge difference in Australia. Don't be ignorant.
Nobody proposed Australia like laws because they know there is not a chance they would go through.
Nobody proposed Australia like laws because they know there is not a chance they would go through. What did happen is that an Islamic terrorist attacked a nightclub with a gun. Instead of confronting the problem of Islamic terrorism they scrubbed his declaration of why he did what he did from the 911 transcript, then proposed legislation making it illegal for someone on the no-fly list to buy a gun. Guess what. This guy wasn't on the no-fly list. In other words the legislation would have no impact on the event that sparked it, except to deflect conversation from the actual problem.
I strongly agree that terrorists shouldn't be allowed to buy guns, but based upon how the no fly list has worked so far I would bet that all sorts of political opponents on the left would start showing up on that list if that legislation went through.
Personally, I don't own a gun and I don't want one. But if I had reason to believe that someone intended to harm me then I would want the right to legally get a gun because I know that in this country they will always be available to criminals. No legislation will ever change that.
My point exactly.
You outlaw what you can and do your best to stop the worst things. That's why gun restrictions are the right thing to do.
You can never prevent everything.
Exactly.Sounds good. After guns the worst thing will be cars. After cars worst thing will be chemicals. After chemicals worst thing will be pets. After pets worst thing will be construction activity. After construction activity will be swimming an bathing. After that it will be choking by eating.
Let us ban everything because [MENTION=840]fishonjazz[/MENTION] thinks we NEED "to stop the worst things".
Exactly.
The two main reasons (which you have probably already heard a million times so I'm not sure why you're asking me) are that Americans consider the right to bear arms a huge deal. Every time there is any indication that this right might be impinged upon gun sales spike. The second is that there are so many guns in circulation that criminals will always be able to get one, no matter how many laws you make against it. So the only people who would be disarmed are the law abiding citizens.Why? Don't Americans want to stop mass shootings? Or this is something which is part of USA forever?