What's new
By:

Stupidest Takes on Jazz Twitter

Jazz twitter is incredibly stupid. I can’t even blame our “beat writers” because if you spend all day engaging with stupid you also end up stupid.

Jazz online fandom is pretty weird to begin with. I feel as though people are extreme homers or people who get off on being negative nancies. Most of the time it’s like bots talking to each other.
 
I think it was a week or two ago, but Andy Larsen put out the question of, “if Keyonte is not Jamal Murray or Brad Beal who is he?” The undertone of that question was, if Keyonte is not a star, is he anyone in this league?

As I’m reading this question I’m thinking, is an undersized scoring combo guard not one of the most well known archetypes in the league? You know, a guy who gets buckets but isn’t quite good enough to be a star. We have a freaking award dedicated to guys like this. IMO, this was a dumbass question because there are a million answers to this question. A microwave scorer off the bench is one of the most common defined roles in the NBA.

But the replies were so ****ing stupid. I’m pretty sure a prominent SLCDUNK guy mentioned Trent Forrest. Trent ****ing Forrest aka the complete opposite of Keyonte. It was a dumb question to begin with, but the dumb *** responses gave validity to the question. People were coming up with the dumbest comparisons possible and made it seem that Andy was right in thinking that Keyonte doesn’t fit a common archetype. How can this be a serious question. Do Jazz not know if a microwave scorer who is not quite a star? There’s a really good example of one on Keyobte’s phone wallpaper lol.

Jazz twitter is just a circle of stupidity.
 
^^^ those are the type of people that Tony has to deal with all day. Some of the questions he gets asked are legit so ****ing dumb and basic. Dude has a lot of patience to deal with guys like that all day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flc
KqWIN said:
I think it was a week or two ago, but Andy Larsen put out the question of, “if Keyonte is not Jamal Murray or Brad Beal who is he?” The undertone of that question was, if Keyonte is not a star, is he anyone in this league?

As I’m reading this question I’m thinking, is an undersized scoring combo guard not one of the most well known archetypes in the league? You know, a guy who gets buckets but isn’t quite good enough to be a star. We have a freaking award dedicated to guys like this. IMO, this was a dumbass question because there are a million answers to this question. A microwave scorer off the bench is one of the most common defined roles in the NBA.

But the replies were so ****ing stupid. I’m pretty sure a prominent SLCDUNK guy mentioned Trent Forrest. Trent ****ing Forrest aka the complete opposite of Keyonte. It was a dumb question to begin with, but the dumb *** responses gave validity to the question. People were coming up with the dumbest comparisons possible and made it seem that Andy was right in thinking that Keyonte doesn’t fit a common archetype. How can this be a serious question. Do Jazz not know if a microwave scorer who is not quite a star? There’s a really good example of one on Keyobte’s phone wallpaper lol.

Jazz twitter is just a circle of stupidity.
Click to expand...
This is an off-shoot from one of Locke's tropes -"if you have many comps in the league as a prospect, you are good(as in - you might pan out in the league)... the problem is if you only have one or two"... But yeah... that question is pretty easy to answer... we have like 3 of them on this roster... one might even say this FO has a type at this point...
 
Elizah Huge said:
^^^ those are the type of people that Tony has to deal with all day. Some of the questions he gets asked are legit so ****ing dumb and basic. Dude has a lot of patience to deal with guys like that all day.
Click to expand...
So what does that say about us when we had one flame war with the poor guy and haven't seen the guy since? Damn.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top