I doubt the Jazz want to move up from 10 all that badly.Does 22/10 move you up higher than 32/29/10?
I doubt the Jazz want to move up from 10 all that badly.Does 22/10 move you up higher than 32/29/10?
Sorry you think good players are boring.
Fisher just mentioned 29/32 for 17 maybe. I wonder if we added the last remaining seconds we have if that would be enough... or maybe you do 29/32 for 22 then 22 and a couple seconds for 17?I wonder if Cleveland could be interested in trading down. That seems like the absolute best case scenario for moving up with 29/32.
Based on the JZ comment it sounds like they'd be more likely to be aggressive to get in the teens... if the tier is 8 players or so then it might be from like 8-15ish.I doubt the Jazz want to move up from 10 all that badly.
And I am your king!!! Idiot!!boring answer
idiot
I really don’t want them getting Carrington.I wonder if Cleveland could be interested in trading down. That seems like the absolute best case scenario for moving up with 29/32.
And I am your king!!! Idiot!!
Fisher just mentioned 29/32 for 17 maybe. I wonder if we added the last remaining seconds we have if that would be enough... or maybe you do 29/32 for 22 then 22 and a couple seconds for 17?
Unless someone does a Whitmore like fall... I think 22 is not gonna be quite far enough to excite me.
Does 22/10 move you up higher than 32/29/10?
LA's offseason is partially dependent on Dlo... if he opts in I think they are second apron and can't aggregate salaries? I think they would be interested in us eating the Vincent deal... which I'd be fine with. Or Dlo opts in and its a Dlo/17 for JC/29/32. Would save them some money/tax this year but Dlo is better than JC so not sure what they'd be thinking tbh.LAL could be one of the few teams that value Clarkson bc the power of friendship. Could add in Clarkson for Vincent.
We could also eat Vincents salary if they don’t want JC.
Vincent for Clarkson also doesn’t work because it’s more than 110%. Would they do Rui for Clarkson? Saves them from the second apron as well.LA's offseason is partially dependent on Dlo... if he opts in I think they are second apron and can't aggregate salaries? I think they would be interested in us eating the Vincent deal... which I'd be fine with. Or Dlo opts in and its a Dlo/17 for JC/29/32. Would save them some money/tax this year but Dlo is better than JC so not sure what they'd be thinking tbh.
DLo isn't opting in to come to UtahLA's offseason is partially dependent on Dlo... if he opts in I think they are second apron and can't aggregate salaries? I think they would be interested in us eating the Vincent deal... which I'd be fine with. Or Dlo opts in and its a Dlo/17 for JC/29/32. Would save them some money/tax this year but Dlo is better than JC so not sure what they'd be thinking tbh.