Supreme Court to Decide Gay Marriage Nationally.

[fishonjazz]

There is less consent in polygamy then Elizabeth Smart consented to her prophets orders. Two women cannot naturally consent to one man. This is not possible.

I disagree

 

[8]

Poll: Does anybody know a couple where husband had a live in girlfriend also?

No active marriages at the time, but Scar Jo lived with Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz (his ex-wife)

 

[Stoked]

I had a buddy that moved in with his GF. She had two room mates, both female. Before it was all said and done they were all sleeping with each other.

 

[Stoked]

There is less consent in polygamy then Elizabeth Smart consented to her prophets orders. Two women cannot naturally consent to one man. This is not possible.

Now you speak for women? Well I guess that is pbvous since you earlier spoke for everyone.

Why does it have to be two women and one man? Why not three men and two women, or 4 men and one woman, or...?

 

[sirkickyass]

As the resident lawyer on the board here's my prediction:

The court punts deciding the issue everyone's talking about here on procedural grounds. There will be no decision re: the 14th Amendment issue.

The court decides that states must honor gay marriages performed in other states under the full faith and credit clause.

 

[Jamezz]

I say leave it to every church. But at least every State should have their own say on it.

 

[[size/HUGE] boobs [/size]]

I disagree

You do not but you think you do.


You will not find 1 natural polygamy situation where woman is not digging gold or whoring herself out for children's sake. Only whores enter polygamy consentually and whoring is not legal. So will polygamy be turned down like Dalamon said it already has.

 

[[size/HUGE] boobs [/size]]

I had a buddy that moved in with his GF. She had two room mates, both female. Before it was all said and done they were all sleeping with each other.

I d not believe unless you and your buddy are into mopedies.

This is not polygamy you describe it is multi-sexualism. Different issue.

Now you speak for women? Well I guess that is pbvous since you earlier spoke for everyone.

Why does it have to be two women and one man? Why not three men and two women, or 4 men and one woman, or...?

Because. LogGrad98 said polygamy not polyandry or gay orgy. Nice try but I do not play your gotcha game.

 

[mellow]

I said that in my OP. (Re: the sovereignty issue)
Except I still think they don't rule definitively on the issue.

I agree, they keep it alive because the false dichotomy of dem vs rep needs a polarizing, non-issue, issue to keep people frenzied over voting and donating.

They ought to be able to get atleast two POTUS election cycles out of this issue.

 

[fishonjazz]

I d not believe unless you and your buddy are into mopedies.

This is not polygamy you describe it is multi-sexualism. Different issue.




Because. LogGrad98 said polygamy not polyandry or gay orgy. Nice try but I do not play your gotcha game.

Gotcha

 

[MVP]

I say leave it to every church. But at least every State should have their own say on it.

what churches have to do with it?

 

[LogGrad98]

Because. LogGrad98 said polygamy not polyandry or gay orgy. Nice try but I do not play your gotcha game.

You don't understand the word apparently.

Polygamy exists in three specific forms: polygyny - wherein a man has multiple simultaneous wives; polyandry - wherein a woman has multiple simultaneous husbands; or group marriage - wherein the family unit consists of multiple husbands and multiple wives.

 

[LogGrad98]

probably never. Canada has already dealt with that 'obstacle'.


homosexual marriage =/= polygamy. Facile comparison.

I made no comparison, I said that it would be the next iteration.

 

[Deleted member 848]

I made no comparison, I said that it would be the next iteration.

wouldn't bet my life savings on that if I were u. Not sure how homosexual marriage becoming institutionalized paves the way for polygamy.

 

[Siro]

I don't see the issue with polygamy as long as it isn't restricted to polygyny.

 

[Jamezz]

what churches have to do with it?

Well, some gay people would like to go through the church. In that case leave it to whatever church decide if they want to grant 'sacred' matrimony to a gay couple or not. I personally don't believe in the church needing to be the 'intermediary' party between anyone's relationship with the Supreme Being or however you wanna call it. To me it's a personal relationship, and it's there.

 

[LogGrad98]

wouldn't bet my life savings on that if I were u. Not sure how homosexual marriage becoming institutionalized paves the way for polygamy.

Reading comprehension. Get some. And a sense of sarcasm. <wink wink >

 

[Deleted member 848]

Reading comprehension. Get some. And a sense of sarcasm. <wink wink >

Lol

*makes ridiculous statement*

*backpedals behind the veil of 'sarcasm'*


Yes log my reading comprehension was rlly what was lacking here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LogGrad98]

Lol

*makes ridiculous statement*

Yes, I was completely saying that I feel that gay marriage is exactly like polygamy and I was hoping for gay plural marriages. Or whatever you thought that meant. Yeah, that's it. That makes complete sense.

*backpedals behind the veil of 'sarcasm'*

Sarcasm? ME??? Never!

Yes log my reading comprehension was rlly what was lacking here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Seriously go re-read my first post that started this conversation between you and me. I was poking fun at the people who make a big deal out of gay marriage.

Sad I had to explain that. I thought you were one of the smart ones.


Nevermind I will copy it in for you.

So when will they repeal the laws against polygamy I wonder? After this then multiple gay marriage is the next Frontier.

probably never. Canada has already dealt with that 'obstacle'.


homosexual marriage =/= polygamy. Facile comparison.

I guess I should have added "protesting", but it was kind of implied. How else would multiple gay marriage be the next frontier?



You know what, nevermind. You are absolutely right, I am in full-on backpedal mode because I made some incredibly serious assertion about gay multiple marriages being the next frontier and now I have to save face for some reason. I guess.

 

[[size/HUGE] boobs [/size]]

You don't understand the word apparently.

Thank you my friend. I will now bow down at Boss Stoked knees in apology for sounding mysogynist. Semantics always trumpets real honest discussion when it comes to politik. Polygamy like dogs is natural in humans because the feminist say so.

Sorry.