What's new

Terror attack on US soil with 12 casualties!

This and Archie's posts are just all kinds of baffling man. I need to start posting here less.
Joe was agreeing with you. He was saying that Christianity has been at fault for lots o violence
 
Cute. Last I checked, Christianity is unequivocally more violent.

You stick to your scholarly-shared Facebook posts. Let the big boys deal with facts, history, and sophisticated analysis.

Um, you deny that Islam isn't violent? Do you read the news?
 
Yeah! No one has ever waged war in the name of Christianity... oh wait...


never mind.

Yep. Christianity, Judaism, Mormonism and pretty much every religion have blood on their hands.
I'm not sure why it's so dumb and offensive to say that a religion that is the cause for so many deaths, especially in the middle east and Africa would make someone want to post here less and say that that claim can only be backed by facebook posts.
 
https://mobile.wnd.com/2015/11/danish-researcher-islam-is-more-violent/

Although, I don't necessarily believe in the measurements used in these "non-facebook" studies, it's still interesting to read.
In all seriousness, is saying Islam is a violent religion really that ignorant and bizarre to say? I feel that it's politically incorrect to say and there are a lot of apologists who will argue it's not, but it just seems inaccurate to me. By no means to I think all members of Islam are violent or condone violence. I'm saying the religion, and teachings can be pretty violent and barbaric. I promise, dalamon, I'm not trying to be offensive (btw, I tried to pm you, but your inbox was full. Can you clear it up so I can send you my message)- I just feel like we need to have some serious discussions, as a world, on how to eliminate violent religious members.
 
Did you forget to switch to your alt before making one of these two posts or are you just having an argument with yourself?

I was just calling myself out on something I messed up on. I'm not afraid to admit I'm wrong. Nothing wrong with that. I thought the posts were in a different thread.
 
Honestly I see this as biased as Archies post. Both have historically lead to huge amounts of violence. To the point of being unable to say who is the ultimate "bad guy".

They can both inspire great good in the world. But both can be interpreted in ways to inspire great violence and evil.

Your second line made me LOL because you did the same thing Archie did with your first line.

Why did you link Joe and Archie's posts? Joe was disagreeing with Archie. Did you miss something or did I?

You're ignoring history books if you think the level of violence across both is equal. Sorry.
 
Back
Top