D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Another day another Al trolljob. Yawn
It's sad because there was a brief period where I thought there might be another reasonable person that had several opinions contrary to my own and that I would be able to learn from them and also learn more about my own position on things. That has not been the case.Another day another Al trolljob. Yawn
It's sad because there was a brief period where I thought there might be another reasonable person that had several opinions contrary to my own and that I would be able to learn from them and also learn more about my own position on things. That has not been the case.
Who watches the watchmen? I don't know about "happier", but I am truer to my authentic self if I at least keep an eye on political issues.I promise you that you’d be a lot happier if you stopped being so invested in politics and letting politics consume your entire life.
I actually agree with Fox News and Repubs this time. The DOJ and Dems need to get stronger on crime and lock MAGA up. We should start with Trump tonight. Time to break up that crime family and bring to Justice those who organized and incited Jan 6.
View: https://twitter.com/davidbadash/status/1586036061649924096?s=46&t=FtIPL8TAxHiuxK-SWiE43A
You do it pretty much daily.No, I don’t know that I’m doing this. Could you cite another post I’ve used the same articles or tweets in?
Bad take. Many don't have the luxury of "not being invested in politics". The fundamental well-being of society and us as individuals is dictated by politics. Those who are less fortunate and cannot afford to ignore our governance could benefit from your advocacy. Blissful unawareness is not the same as happiness.I just want to throw something out there that maybe one or two will maybe take to heart.
I promise you that you’d be a lot happier if you stopped being so invested in politics and letting politics consume your entire life.
Well, it is for certain segments of the population. It isn't apples to apples, it is apples to gold-foiled fruit of paradise in some cases.Bad take. Many don't have the luxury of "not being invested in politics". The fundamental well-being of society and us as individuals is dictated by politics. Those who are less fortunate and cannot afford to ignore our governance could benefit from your advocacy. Blissful unawareness is not the same as happiness.
Family values and a clear plan for economic recovery incoming...
Hmmm...Maybe I should run for office then.Just…… wow. Whole lot of crazy in there.
My favorite was kari lake saying that any actor who gets cancelled is now her favorite actor.
Exactly as i have been saying. Want the right to love you? Say something stupid and act like an *** hole, get called out for it and boom, you are the rights newest hero. Bunch of simpletons.
These days the more corrupt and scummy you are the better chance you have of getting republicans to vote for you. Its a beneficial character trait to be a douchebag in the republican party.
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
What I've gotten out of the article so far:More details of Government colluding with private business. We had a conversation a couple weeks back about Covid censorship, these leaks look like it went a bit further than just Covid.
What I've gotten out of the article so far:
1) The US government is identifying mis/dis/malinformation for social media platforms.
2) The platforms themselves decide to what to remove, label, etc.
3) There are no criminal or civil penalties, nor any other coercion I have seen mentioned.
4) The government wants to handle the process more efficiently and effectively.
Did I misunderstand something?
But they are openly callings lies lies! Based on actual information!!!What I've gotten out of the article so far:
1) The US government is identifying mis/dis/malinformation for social media platforms.
2) The platforms themselves decide to what to remove, label, etc.
3) There are no criminal or civil penalties, nor any other coercion I have seen mentioned.
4) The government wants to handle the process more efficiently and effectively.
Did I misunderstand something?
Yes, my point.What I've gotten out of the article so far:
1) The US government is identifying mis/dis/malinformation for social media platforms.
2) The platforms themselves decide to what to remove, label, etc.
3) There are no criminal or civil penalties, nor any other coercion I have seen mentioned.
4) The government wants to handle the process more efficiently and effectively.
Did I misunderstand something?