What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Hopefully that's another thing that gets cracked down on. Go after megacorp for that ******** as well

As for Mom and pop shop going out of business because they can't pay the corporate tax rate... Easy fix. Don't hit mom and pop shop with the corporate tax rate. Hit the wealthiest companies. Have a minimum profit amount or whatever (the proposals I have seen have a minimum amount attached to the proposal) that triggers the corporate tax rate.
I've seen thresholds proposed on capital gains rates and that bonkers unrealized gains tax, but at this point I don't know where Kamala wants things to end up. In the past 24 hours she's actually thrown Joe Biden under the bus saying he was too hostile to business and has proposed her own lower tax rates.



Kamala racing to lower taxes is new. I don't know where she's going with this.

man-shrugging-shoulders.jpg
 
I've seen thresholds proposed on capital gains rates and that bonkers unrealized gains tax, but at this point I don't know where Kamala wants things to end up. In the past 24 hours she's actually thrown Joe Biden under the bus saying he was too hostile to business and has proposed her own lower tax rates.



Kamala racing to lower taxes is new. I don't know where she's going with this.

man-shrugging-shoulders.jpg

You and me both brother.
 
Something else worth pointing out along these lines is that most of the time these changes tend to take aim at mega-corporations, not mom and pop shops. Thresholds often are at the $100 million mark for which corporations pay what. There is no reason we shouldn't be taxing mega-corps, especially those that are effectively oligopolies, hugely for the privilege of having not been regulated to allow them to get so big in the first place. Too big to fail needs to go away as that was proven to be entirely ********. If you make up 1/3 of the biggest companies controlling a single industry you should be paying max taxes, marginal corp rates on the order of 80%+. That is, after all, what ALL large corporations paid in the American economic hey-day of the 50's. And that did nothing to stifle anything. Everyone prospered. No reason not to go back to that after all.

I also think we need laws around stock buy-backs and other hand-outs to rich shareholders. A flat 50% tax on buy-backs would be good to start. If you want to do a $1.5 bill buy-back, you pay half that amount in tax straight up. So it costs you $1.5 bill + $750 mill, so a $1.5 bill buy-back costs $2.25 bill. I mean if you are reaping such windfall profits it must have been at the expense of either taxes or prices or wages. Only fair to balance the playing-field.
Oregon has a ballot measure this year, proposing 3% tax on businesses with revenues over $25,000,000, and giving every adult resident $1,600/yr.
 
Oregon has a ballot measure this year, proposing 3% tax on businesses with revenues over $25,000,000, and giving every adult resident $1,600/yr.
I could get behind that. Some kind of UBI would make a lot of sense nationwide, even if it were just a supplement to social security. Easily paid for if we just went back to the basic tax rates for the rich and large corporations from the 50's. As would universal health insurance, increase social security benefits, and even free child care. But instead we fund stock buy-backs as handouts to the wealthy with taxes from the middle class. We are so ***-backward it's just ridiculously stupid.
 
Not a fan of UBI, personally. Especially not in the form of "Here's a bunch of money for everybody, do whatever you want with it!"

I'm a big fan of strong welfare programs with easier access, but UBI is begging for inflation and a net negative overall outcome.
 
Not a fan of UBI, personally. Especially not in the form of "Here's a bunch of money for everybody, do whatever you want with it!"

I'm a big fan of strong welfare programs with easier access, but UBI is begging for inflation and a net negative overall outcome.
Ya I'm not for UBI right now.
Maybe once automation and AI is eliminating a huge chunk of the workforce. Right not unemployment is pretty low.

I do think that it might be a good idea to have a framework for some sort of UBI ready to implement for when unemployment is way high due to machines/tech doing all our with for us.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTS
I could get behind that. Some kind of UBI would make a lot of sense nationwide, even if it were just a supplement to social security. Easily paid for if we just went back to the basic tax rates for the rich and large corporations from the 50's. As would universal health insurance, increase social security benefits, and even free child care. But instead we fund stock buy-backs as handouts to the wealthy with taxes from the middle class. We are so ***-backward it's just ridiculously stupid.
It's not going to happen until people can't afford to buy their products. And I mean when the employees of these companies can't afford to buy the things they make. Everyday items.
 
Listening to KSL 1160 on the way to work this morning.
Last year Americans spent a record amount on Halloween. 12.2 billion.
Expectations are that we set a new record this year.
If people are really struggling to survive then candy and Halloween costumes are not really needs, but rather wants and we probably shouldn't spend the money we don't have on candy and costumes.

Also, I think it's really weird how many adults get hyped up about Halloween and how Halloween costumes are super important to adults. It's strange to me. My wife and my family and many of my friends get really excited about dressing up for Halloween and put a lot of effort into finding the best or funniest costume or whatever. I don't understand this behavior in adults.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 

"Fox NewsJessica Tarlov struggled to make sense of Donald Trump’s confusing response to a question about making child care more affordable on Thursday.

“I would dare any of you to listen to his answer on child care and tell me what the hell he was talking about,” the co-host of “The Five” said of the former pres


“It was one of the more incoherent things I’ve ever heard.”

The Republican nominee, who has sparked questions overhismentalacuity during his campaign, cooked up a rambling reply when asked at the Economic Club of New York whether he’d commit to prioritizing legislation related to child care should he return to the White House.

“It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because, look, child care is child care. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it — in this country, you have to have it,” said Trump before pivoting to talk of imposing tariffs on imported goods.

Tarlov declared that the former president’s remarks “really highlight a big problem.”

“Everyone is saying, ’Well, Trump is so transparent and Trump’s out there and that’s all that matters.′ What matters is the content of what he’s saying and none of it, none of it is explainable,” Tarlov said.

She noted that the cost of child care is a “big priority” for people, an issue she described as a “central plank” in Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign.

“He doesn’t have an answer besides tariffs and [Trump’s running mate] JD Vance yesterday was talking about just have grandma and grandpa do more, that that’s some sort of solution for people,” said Tarlov who referred to the Ohio senator’s suggestion to lower the cost of day care.

She continued, “He’s gonna have energy prices — drill, baby, drill — even though we’re producing more oil than we’ve ever have before, leading the world. More tax cuts for the rich and tariffs are the only way we’re gonna be paying for it.”
 
Back
Top