What's new
By:

The Inevitable Favs Reunion

Cptgrnlngs22 said:
Is there any incentive for NO to want to take on Ed’s **** contract? I’m sure picks would have to be attached. They gave us 2 second rounders when we traded him their way I’m pretty sure.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Yes... we can offer cash... say 3-4 M. They will want to operate over the cap anyway so doesn’t cost them space. Gives them a free or quality vet at a minimum cost. Might require a second but that’s fine.

Just sucks for DL to have to go ask for the cash to do it. Would assume Favs takes less than the minimum too.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Wait, what? Why? And if he's taking the minimum, why do all the gymnastics to get him here?
Click to expand...
Meant MLE... can’t take less than the minimum of course
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Meant MLE... can’t take less than the minimum of course
Click to expand...
Sure he can. He just won’t be playing basketball for it. Last I heard there was a coaching vacancy, which may get about as much backup defense production from the sidelines as we got this past year on the floor.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Meant MLE... can’t take less than the minimum of course
Click to expand...
Ah.

And he better. If he is playing almost-exclusively at the 5, his salary should be commensurate to his contribution. In other words; he better come cheap.

I really like Favors but I think not using the backup 5 to build out the overall versatility of the roster is a straight-up mistake, ESPECIALLY if it caused us to lose Clarkson.
 
Last edited:
If we are going cheap for a backup center then I would sign Udoh. The Jazz would have beaten Denver with him in the lineup.
 
I see the Jazz trying to get Jae Crowder back before Favors. 45% from 3 this season, and 77% from free throws. Favors doesn't come close to those numbers.

We can get Crowder for the MLE, and Baynes for the MIN. We'd just need to trade Conley to get our 3 and D wing.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Why the **** would Crowder be going anywhere?
Click to expand...
He will get a one year overpay from Miami... I bet Jae loves it there and he fits in quite well.
 
Also, we chose Dante over Jae... just saying Dante's deal could have been the filler. We missed Jae's toughness but might not have gotten JC so maybe its a wash.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Ah.

And he better. If he is playing almost-exclusively at the 5, his salary should be commensurate to his contribution. In other words; he better come cheap.

I really like Favors but I think not using the backup 5 to build out the overall versatility of the roster is a straight-up mistake, ESPECIALLY if it caused us to lose Clarkson.
Click to expand...
I think we can make the budget work for a sign and trade. I also think there are some situations where you could play Favs with Rudy... like when we started Morgan and Rudy together... it might help free Rudy up. I think we have enough off the dribble shot making with Mike, DM, JC to keep the offense afloat. I'm talking like 4-6 minutes in some matchups.

I just think he's the safest option and if he actually wants to come here maybe the best. If we insist on starting Conley and bringing Joe off the bench it might get us the good version of Joe since he will have his pick and roll partner.

I think we can keep JC fairly easily. I don't think a lot of teams are lining up to pay him. His game is somewhat off putting to some I'm sure. Doesn't have the respect some other bench gunners do yet. Locke mentioned he loves LA but he sucked with Lebron and Clips have Lou Will. I think we are the best match with regard to money and fit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top