What's new
By:

The Jazz don't have much young talent...

Exum and Mitchell are both plenty athletic and both have their limitations. Exum isn't as vertically explosive and Mitchell can't elevate off 1 foot. Both struggle at playing above the rim (but some of that on Exum last year may have been because of the knee surgery recovery).
 
Ron Mexico said:
It is with a couple step start but you can jump off one or two feet. I did not watch Mitchell do the test but I am pretty sure he is one of the people who jumped off two feet.
Click to expand...

Mitchell has never dunked off 1 foot in a game. He said so himself at the Hall of Fame interview.
 
MVP said:
No need for prescriptions. Just check draft combine, Exum's no step vertical and max vertical is below average for his size. Mitchell's is elite.
Click to expand...

Go ahead and post it, if you really think this is the case.

Otherwise, Again, perfect post for a stat watcher who never sees these guys play.

Mitchells only hope of getting to the rim in traffic is his quickness. Dante can get to the rim much easier, even after the ACL.

Mitchell has better lateral movement now, but Dante's was better before the ACL.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Exum and Mitchell are both plenty athletic and both have their limitations. Exum isn't as vertically explosive and Mitchell can't elevate off 1 foot. Both struggle at playing above the rim (but some of that on Exum last year may have been because of the knee surgery recovery).
Click to expand...

I don't even know what to say. Even after the injury, Dante can get to the rim, where Mitchell is relying on quickness to get past players. Dante is way more effective at getting to the rim.

Dante can get to the rim in traffic, and put the ball over people. DM has to be quick enough to get past them.
 
ONE LOVE said:
For some reason the Jazz seem to be very reluctant to draft a 'shooter'?


There's Devin Booker. Then there's Kyle Kuzma that the Jazz were reportedly cold on because they didn't think his shooting is legit? Kuzma has been killing it for the Lakers and looks like a legit scorer for years to come for them. Instead they traded up to draft a back up center, Tony Bradley.


I mean, you've got to take a calculated risk sometime, right? Otherwise how can you get a good player? It's like how Quin keeps telling Ingles to put up 3's. If you don't put them up, how can they go in? Same thing with picking players. If you keep hesitating to draft 'shooters', then where are you gonna get them? From outer space??!?!
Click to expand...


But truth be told, Booker is going to be hot garbage though right...
High volume guy on **** teams.
 
Cappy_Smurf said:
I don't even know what to say. Even after the injury, Dante can get to the rim, where Mitchell is relying on quickness to get past players. Dante is way more effective at getting to the rim.

Dante can get to the rim in traffic, and put the ball over people. DM has to be quick enough to get past them.
Click to expand...


Allow me to on behalf of MVP post DISLIKE
 
MVP said:
I am not picking one over other. It's just an numeric statistical fact to those who argue that Exum is more athletic.
Click to expand...

I totally get you with DM being far more of a natural basketball athlete. He is amazingly coordinated and moves like a jackal (or something smooth and fast).

But I totally think you are trusting aesthetics too much.

Dante is as quick as you get. His first step perhaps unmatched. He can see the court and cannot be stopped getting deep into the paint. He has far more potential than any player on the team (not named Rudy) of averaging 8-10 ft attempts per night. And this team needs that desperately - would compensate for Hood having no real rim game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top