OK, got it. NOW we are just arguing semantics, so I apologize.
To be clear, when I say best case scenario, what I'm referring to is best reasonably likely scenario. If people think it's reasonably likely that a 24 year old improves and gets back to what he had already done before, I can see where they are coming from, and maybe they are right. I can also see the argument that he's been in the league for 6 years and hasn't really improved or added anything to his game, he has had multiple instances that point to him not being serious about basketball, his injuries and the league adjusting to him have minimized his effectiveness, and so it's not reasonably likely he ever gets back to his best season.