What's new

The mystery man Tony Jones was talking about

I don’t see it as Ingram. He may not be a “star,” but that’s a massive acquisition and isn’t described as “a guy who’s not a star but better than a starter.” He’d be described at minimum as an all-star or a guy who has been an all-star.
 
I don’t see it as Ingram. He may not be a “star,” but that’s a massive acquisition and isn’t described as “a guy who’s not a star but better than a starter.” He’d be described at minimum as an all-star or a guy who has been an all-star.
Ya to be Ingram feels like a better player than Tony was describing

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
I don't think anyone besides Tony Jones himself is really calibrated to his player evaluation levels. Like what does it mean to be better than starter level, but not all star level? I kind of get it, but based on reading Tony's descriptions of players on Twitter in the past I'm not sure it means what you might think it means.
 
I don't think anyone besides Tony Jones himself is really calibrated to his player evaluation levels. Like what does it mean to be better than starter level, but not all star level? I kind of get it, but based on reading Tony's descriptions of players on Twitter in the past I'm not sure it means what you might think it means.

If you asked TJ, I bet he’d say he’s a star because he’s a star or he’s not a star because he isn’t.
 
Back
Top