Draymond already back at it.
That FT discrepancy is pretty rough from this game.LeBron with 36 points, 12 assists and 20 rebounds last night (double overtime win)
Vando played 41 minutes and was 4-7 from the field for 14 points, 9 rebounds, and 5 assists.
Steph Curry attempted 21 three point shots! Klay Thompson attempted 17!
That has to be a record
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
One team shot 58 3's and the other 27. Just on the surface, looking at that, it makes sense.That FT discrepancy is pretty rough from this game.
Draymond already back at it.
I watched the all possesions recap after seeing the shocking result and would say that was a very strong full team effort from Pistons. They limited their turnovers and passed the ball much better than OKC who didnt really pass the ball inside at all but just took 3s or went dribble and drive offense for the most parts. SGA had a great game, but OKC bench didnt help the starters at all really.Didnt watch, but looks like Jalen Duren straight dawged Holmgren.
Cade's destiny is to end up as a 2nd/3rd banana somewhere.I watched the all possesions recap after seeing the shocking result and would say that was a very strong full team effort from Pistons. They limited their turnovers and passed the ball much better than OKC who didnt really pass the ball inside at all but just took 3s or went dribble and drive offense for the most parts. SGA had a great game, but OKC bench didnt help the starters at all really.
Also props to Jaden Ivey who was pretty inefficient on offense but made some mad hustle plays all game. He also took care of the ball.
The thing is.... Pistons are now 3-6 in games without Cade, and 3-34 in games with him. As a team they have averaged 3.4 less TO and 3.2 more assists when Cade is out. Thats not a good look for those who own a lot of "Cade as #1 option" stocks.
I watched the all possesions recap after seeing the shocking result and would say that was a very strong full team effort from Pistons. They limited their turnovers and passed the ball much better than OKC who didnt really pass the ball inside at all but just took 3s or went dribble and drive offense for the most parts. SGA had a great game, but OKC bench didnt help the starters at all really.
Also props to Jaden Ivey who was pretty inefficient on offense but made some mad hustle plays all game. He also took care of the ball.
The thing is.... Pistons are now 3-6 in games without Cade, and 3-34 in games with him. As a team they have averaged 3.4 less TO and 3.2 more assists when Cade is out. Thats not a good look for those who own a lot of "Cade as #1 option" stocks.
What exactly is reaching? The numbers are what they are, and its a bad look... that was literally all I said.That's reaching
It's a stretch. The Cade stuff. Cmon now. They arent better without Cade. Correlation is not causation.What exactly is reaching? The numbers are what they are, and its a bad look... that was literally all I said.
It's a stretch. The Cade stuff. Cmon now. They arent better without Cade.
When you're ona team as bad as the Pistons there are so many variables that this stuff is just highly reductive. They are better with Cade.View attachment 15896
Being a top usage guy in your position group with low end role player level PSA and a tragic TOV% isnt causation either?
Ok so the head of the snake does not have a major role in them being a bad team, but instead the team makes the head of the snake look bad.When you're ona team as bad as the Pistons there are so many variables that this stuff is just highly reductive. They are better with Cade.
When the Warriors had their record year they lost to the kings. **** happens.Ok so the head of the snake does not have a major role in them being a bad team, but instead the team makes the head of the snake look bad.
Got it.
Funny though how that historically inept team that makes Cade look awful somehow manages to beat a fully healthy OKC without him.
Jordan Poole disagrees.Dray is your neighbor's Pitbull, 'cept with Dray you have the comfort of knowing he won't tear the face off a baby.
A losing player who takes 20 shots per game, has a career 51.7 TS% (and 31.9 3P%) and gets superstar usage (30.3%) is worth "anyone not named Lauri" and picks?I would gladly give up anyone not named Lauri for Cade on our roster and a couple picks to go with.