What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Archie Moses said:
Name me another poll with more people poll'd.

Usually, polls only poll a few hundred or a few thousand and represent a much larger group. It's called laws of probability.

Click to expand...

Find me the numbers of said poll first. Then we can divulge into things like 98% of democrats in Utah were unfavorable and then compare that to Republicans 84% approval then find the median on how many of each party voted and we can weed out political bias. Until then were just looking at random percentages.

I think this is from the website that came up with civiqs.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanit...-public-opinion-data/v/why-polls-can-be-wrong
 
Last edited:
Both sides are to blame on this guys. The democrats are equally as bad. Remember that one time Obama cancelled that one meeting with that one ally over that one thing? Both sides are equally to blame for this. There’s definitely zero difference between the two parties. Democrats wouldn’t have spoken out at all if Obama or Clinton had said this.
 
The Thriller said:
Both sides are to blame on this guys. The democrats are equally as bad. Remember that one time Obama cancelled that one meeting with that one ally over that one thing? Both sides are equally to blame for this. There’s definitely zero difference between the two parties. Democrats wouldn’t have spoken out at all if Obama or Clinton had said this.
Click to expand...

I agree, both sides are to blame on all of this.
 
Safetydan said:
I could do without your hyperbolic word choice. "useless" lol. I already stated as much in a different post. Please keep up.

You guys are silly. Going to such lengths to discredit a poll.
Click to expand...
Are you for real? I honestly don't care about the poll at all. And sorry it hurts your feelings, but the analysis of statistical relevance you posted is irrelevant when the poll is self-selected.
 
In Denmark, bewilderment and anger at Trump's cancelled visit. I know he thinks the world revolves around himself, but it still surprises me that he is so willing to broadcast to the world that he is a petulant 10 year old. He's just a big baby, and has no shame in acting as such before the entire world.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ing-with-danish-leader-over-greenland-no-sale

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEJm1zGj7nhs6CNXIyDXR7FkqFwgEKg8IACoHCAowjuuKAzCWrzww5oEY?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Denmark was ready for the visit:



Way to insult an ally, for no good reason...

Former Danish PM:







Really....

 
Last edited:
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Are you for real? I honestly don't care about the poll at all. And sorry it hurts your feelings, but the analysis of statistical relevance you posted is irrelevant when the poll is self-selected.
Click to expand...
Bruh,

1. I clearly exist.

2. The other guy was complaining about the sample size specifically and I was responding to that.

3. Even so, I stated clearly that a self-selected observation set will invite bias in a previous post. The "relevance is irrelevant" to the extent that you misunderstand what kind of bias is introduced.
 
Last edited:
This is gonna go over real well among Jewish communities, especially the whole, “second coming of god” thingie...



 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Red
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top