You called me a traitor and you know nothing about me. Nothing..
I’m confused. I think he was insulting trump supporters and if are an independent and not a trump supporter, why would you be personally offended?
You called me a traitor and you know nothing about me. Nothing..
He was talking specifically to me you idiot.I’m confused. I think he was insulting trump supporters and if are an independent and not a trump supporter, why would you be personally offended?
At least you admit it's a conspiracy.OK, so let's sum up what we know so far. Two businessmen helped Rudy Giuliani work the Ukrainians to investigate Biden at the request of Donald Trump. Those businessmen were illegally funneling Russian money into Trump's campaign, as well as donating to some of his most staunch congressional defenders, including the Republican leader in the House.
Those businessmen wanted the removal of a career US ambassador to Ukraine because she was opposed to Ukraine replacing two members of their state owned gas company with those two men. Trump later removed that ambassador, and replaced her with a man who donated millions of dollars to his campaign and later inauguration fund.
Finally Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine to try to get their president to, again, work with Giuliani and others to dig up dirt on Joe Biden and his son.
The DOJ was aware of the investigation into the two businessmen for illegal campaign contributions, but declined to take any action when the whistleblower presented them with the complaint about Trump's phone call, which was related to the matter.
Yeah, this doesn't look like a criminal conspiracy at all.
When you say "this doesn't look like" you lose the idea that it's a fact. Things "looking like" is subjective thus it's a conspiracy until fact. Now if you said "this is a criminal conspiracy" you're opinion would hold weight.
Thank you for this lesson on pedantry. I will take your words to heart.When you say "this doesn't look like" you lose the idea that it's a fact. Things "looking like" is subjective thus it's a conspiracy until fact. Now if you said "this is a criminal conspiracy" you're opinion would hold weight.
Good job young Padawan. I'll make a sophisticate out of you yet.Thank you for this lesson on pedantry. I will take your words to heart.
I guess I should add to this that we also know Rudy met with these two men in Dallas hours before they were intercepted by law enforcement with one way tickets out of the country.OK, so let's sum up what we know so far. Two businessmen helped Rudy Giuliani work the Ukrainians to investigate Biden at the request of Donald Trump. Those businessmen, who described themselves as part of Trump's legal team, were illegally funneling Russian money into Trump's campaign, as well as donating to some of his most staunch congressional defenders, including the Republican leader in the House.
Those businessmen wanted the removal of a career US ambassador to Ukraine because she was opposed to Ukraine replacing two members of their state owned gas company with those two men. Trump later removed that ambassador, and replaced her with a man who donated millions of dollars to his campaign and later inauguration fund.
Finally Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine to try to get their president to, again, work with Giuliani and others to dig up dirt on Joe Biden and his son.
The DOJ was aware of the investigation into the two businessmen for illegal campaign contributions, but declined to take any action when the whistleblower presented them with the complaint about Trump's phone call, which was related to the matter.
Yeah, this doesn't look like a criminal conspiracy at all.
OK, so let's sum up what we know so far. Two businessmen helped Rudy Giuliani work the Ukrainians to investigate Biden at the request of Donald Trump. Those businessmen, who described themselves as part of Trump's legal team, were illegally funneling Russian money into Trump's campaign, as well as donating to some of his most staunch congressional defenders, including the Republican leader in the House.
Those businessmen wanted the removal of a career US ambassador to Ukraine because she was opposed to Ukraine replacing two members of their state owned gas company with those two men. Trump later removed that ambassador, and replaced her with a man who donated millions of dollars to his campaign and later inauguration fund.
Finally Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine to try to get their president to, again, work with Giuliani and others to dig up dirt on Joe Biden and his son.
The DOJ was aware of the investigation into the two businessmen for illegal campaign contributions, but declined to take any action when the whistleblower presented them with the complaint about Trump's phone call, which was related to the matter.
Yeah, this doesn't look like a criminal conspiracy at all.
“Last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limits in our elections. I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.”
Check out the videotape: Alito’s “not true” was spoken specifically in response to Obama’s claim about the risk of foreign influence in U.S. elections.
This again... just blows my mind.
People are okay with this?
Russia.I remember when liberals were screaming about how citizens united would invite foreigners to unjustly influence our elections. Conservatives including Justice Alito claimed we were merely being over dramatic. Remember? Justice Alito during the SOTU:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/21/justice-alito-you-owe-president-obama-an-apology/
Good times.
Look at this photograph!!!
This again... just blows my mind.
People are okay with this?
This again... just blows my mind.
People are okay with this?
I’m confused. I think he was insulting trump supporters and if are an independent and not a trump supporter, why would you be personally offended?
He was talking specifically to me you idiot.
"It's supporters like you that I would consider a traitor."
PS I'm not offended. All I'm doing is pointing out how absolutely stupid it was. I know I'm not a traitor.
Good job young Padawan. I'll make a sophisticate out of you yet.
Look at this photograph!!!
I was thinking more of discussions either in person or here on Jazzfazz. No reason to barge in and interrupt a stranger’s lunch no matter what kind of hat they’re wearing. That’s just needlessly rude behavior.Like what? What do you suggest I do to this guy wearing a MAGA hat sitting across Taco Time(lunch)? He's just minding his own business enjoying himself hurting no one.
You know, I don’t believe your pretense. Traitor has been inexorably linked to treason since Benedict Arnold. That’s the common usage. As for false generalizations, I wasn’t comparing everyone who calls someone a traitor to Trump. I was comparing you, and your usage in this thread, to Trump. Not only do you use the word in the same manner as Trump, as a deliberately false rhetorical bludgeon, but you relish its effect. A way to troll other posters. Also, very Trump like.your premise that all traitors are committing treason is incorrect and certainly not common usage.
you claim that I deviated from “common usage” but provided no evidence to back up your claim. Please explain specifically what you mean.
And finally, you are arguing that because trump calls people traitors for a certain reason, that everyone who does so must be for the same reason. This is a logical fallacy/ false generalization.