What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

The Thriller said:
What part of moving communications with foreign leaders that are politically damaging (like blackmailing the president of Ukraine to manufacture dirt on political opponents) onto a secret server is legal?
Click to expand...
I’m sorry, did I opine on that, or did I simply just issue a conditional statement?
 
infection said:
I’m sorry, did I opine on that, or did I simply just issue a conditional statement?
Click to expand...

No, but you seem to be equating Trump’s use of a server to Clinton’s, (a) as if they’re the same and (b) democrats are acting hypocritically. Both are different and both are far worse for Trump.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
This is a perfectly sound statement as long as you are willing to rely on hearsay as proof.
Click to expand...
It is not secret information that Kavannaugh was a booze-hound ****head in college. The only thing in dispute is whether he’s also a rapist; something the administration has steered investigative efforts away from finding.

This doesn’t touch that he was gung-ho on taking Clinton down, then when working for Bush stating that presidents should be immune from prosecution while in office. He was hand-picked to keep Trump in office.
 
NUMBERICA said:
It is not secret information that Kavannaugh was a booze-hound ****head in college. The only thing in dispute is whether he’s also a rapist.

This doesn’t touch that he was gung-ho on taking Clinton down, then when working for Bush stating that presidents should be immune from prosecution while in office. He was hand-picked to keep Trump in office.
Click to expand...
The rape accusations are a pretty big issue, don't you think? Are you aware of anyone who wouldn't be harmed by such suggestions if proof was deemed to be unnecessary (as it has with the left under these circumstances). Innocent until proven guilty used to be a thing.
 
Catchall said:
He made a joke here about how spies were treated in the past. He's not calling for someone to be killed.
Click to expand...
You are working overtime to rationalize a clear threat. He knows exactly what he’s doing, he did this in 2016 to incite violence against protestors at his rallies.

Also, for the record, absolutely **** the “good old days”.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
The rape accusations are a pretty big issue, don't you think? Are you aware of anyone who wouldn't be harmed by such suggestions if proof was deemed to be unnecessary (as it has with the left under these circumstances). Innocent until proven guilty used to be a thing.
Click to expand...
I do think sexual assault is a huge issue, I don’t think anyone that has attempted it should be a judge, and I think Kavannaugh has committed it numerous times.

Proof was deemed necessary, there was a mock investigation, but that gives credence to the seriousness. Also, besides that Ford’s testimony was largely deemed credible, she’s not the only one to come forward.

For the record, I think trying to get rid of Kavannaugh now is a waste of time since it’s not going to happen.

It is strange to me that the thing that makes a rape allegation a big deal to you is the harm it does to the perpetrator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top