What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Catchall said:
It's the DOJ investigation being led by John Durham that involves Ukraine. That's why Trump indicated that Bill Barr may be in touch with Zellensky in the call transcript. Seems like I'm telling you this for about the fifth time now. Several media are reporting it, just not the lefty media who are pretending it's not true.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/25/john-durham-probing-ukraine-as-part-of-trump-russi/

Attorney General William P. Barr this year tapped Mr. Durham, the top federal prosecutor in Connecticut, to look into the origins of the FBI probe into alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential race, an investigation that ultimately gave way to special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

Mr. Durham has been silent about what he has uncovered, but the Justice Department said he has set his sights on Ukraine.

“A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election,” Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement.

=========

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...g-into-ukrainian-involvement-in-2016-election

The Justice Department revealed that U.S. Attorney John Durham, picked by Attorney General William Barr to look into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, is investigating whether Ukraine was involved in any 2016 election efforts.

“A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election,” DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said Wednesday. “While the Attorney General has yet to contact Ukraine in connection with this investigation, certain Ukrainians who are not members of the government have volunteered information to Mr. Durham, which he is evaluating.”
Click to expand...

I’m asking about reporters. John Durham isn’t a reporter. I thought you said that other reporters had been looking into firing of the prosecutor or something? Seemed like John Solomon is about the only one listed in this forum who’s taken the anti-Biden side on this since the spring. Were there others? Who are they? That’s what I’m asking.

Why am I supposed to find Durham/Barr credible in an “investigation” into Ukrainian corruption again? Didn’t the whistleblower explain that Barr was in on this corrupt attempt to manufacture dirt? So why wouldn’t any rational person find whatever they report to be credible?
 
Catchall said:
So what's the cover-up here?
Click to expand...

I swear this has been explained to you like 10 times.

Asking a foreign country to help you manufacture dirt on a political rival is illegal.

Holding up foreign aid passed by Congress to another country because they aren’t manufacturing dirt on a political rival is illegal.

Denying all this and attempting to kill the complaint rather than present it to congress so you can try obstruct justice is illegal.

Attempting to out the whistleblower and calling for his death is again, obstruction of justice (which is illegal).

There’s probably more, hence the impeachment inquiry.

Your inability to recognize trump’s crimes is on you. Maybe you’re just dumb?
 
colton said:
This.
Click to expand...

I'm sure the administration was all over the previous president owning a chocolate empire inside Russia, or any of the shady dealings related to the port authority in Odessa.

I'm betting Pence has asked Zelensky lots of hard questions about his relationship with Igor Kolomoisky. I'm sure Mike Pompeo has requested regular briefings regarding the disposition of the Privatbank affair.

They are just so concerned about corruption in Ukraine.
 
The Thriller said:
I’m asking about reporters. John Durham isn’t a reporter. I thought you said that other reporters had been looking into firing of the prosecutor or something? Seemed like John Solomon is about the only one listed in this forum who’s taken the side of trump on this.
Click to expand...

That's why I included two links to articles by real, live reporters and included excerpts. I thought you'd be able to put 1+1 together. My mistake...

Also, it's not about taking sides and editorializing. Journalism is about reporting verifiable facts, especially in cases involving legal allegations. What is it you teach again?

The Thriller said:
Why am I supposed to find Durham/Barr credible in an “investigation” into Ukrainian corruption again? Didn’t the whistleblower explain that Barr was in on this corrupt attempt to manufacture dirt?
Click to expand...

Because AG Barr and John Durham are the top of the U.S. Justice Department and they deal with real crimes and real evidence. This whistle-blower is an anonymous CIA guy, making second-hand allegations, and breaking procedure by sending his memo directly to Dem-hack Adam Schiff on Aug. 12.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Believe whatever you want. I believe that Gorsuch, Garland, Kavanaugh and everyone else all deserve the right to presumption of innocence. I believe that the media is repeatedly defaming Kavanaugh even though all they have produced are accusations... some of them wildly outlandish.
Click to expand...

I haven't heard anything particularly outlandish. Then again, I was a Catholic kid in a contemporary time at a Catholic school. Perhaps you're just a guarded, delicate soul.
 
Catchall said:
That's why I included two links to articles by real, live reporters and included excerpts. I thought you'd be able to put 1+1 together. My mistake...

Also, it's not about taking sides and editorializing. Journalism is about reporting verifiable facts, especially in cases involving legal allegations. What is it you teach again?



Because AG Barr and John Durham are the top of the U.S. Justice Department and they deal with real crimes and real evidence. This whistle-blower is an anonymous CIA guy, making second-hand allegations, and breaking procedure by sending his memo directly to Dem-hack Adam Schiff on Aug. 12.
Click to expand...

Hasn't the anonymous whistleblower tentatively agreed to testify?
 
Catchall said:
That's why I included two links to articles by real, live reporters and included excerpts. I thought you'd be able to put 1+1 together. My mistake...

Also, it's not about taking sides and editorializing. Journalism is about reporting verifiable facts, especially in cases involving legal allegations. What is it you teach again?



Because AG Barr and John Durham are the top of the U.S. Justice Department and they deal with real crimes and real evidence. This whistle-blower is an anonymous CIA guy, making second-hand allegations, and breaking procedure by sending his memo directly to Dem-hack Adam Schiff on Aug. 12.
Click to expand...

You gave me links to articles written over he past few days about Barr’s current “investigation” in Ukraine. The same Barr implicated in the whistleblower complaint of being in on the Trump corruption scheme which up to this point has been proven true. Soooooo
 
Catchall said:
So what's the cover-up here?
Click to expand...

Also, I can’t imagine trump asking for the NRA to fund his defense as long as he doesn’t pass any gun reform is legal. Let alone ethical.

So add another to the list of crimes!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top