What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

What was your question about the Federalist article? That was the one saying that the requirements for matters of "urgent concern" were changed right before the whistleblower complaint was filed, removing the requirement for first-hand knowledge.

Lol

 
The the prosecutor who was fired and Burisma's U.S. legal team seem to contradict the popular story in the press

I feel like we had this discussion already when you posted this article previously.

Suffice to say John Solomon has a long history of presenting facts sans relevant context to fit a preconceived narrative. He did this previously with Hillary and Uranium One, and it appears he's doing the same with this story.

What was your question about the Federalist article? That was the one saying that the requirements for matters of "urgent concern" were changed right before the whistleblower complaint was filed, removing the requirement for first-hand knowledge.

Yes, that has been shown to be a lie. I was wondering if that would color your perception of them as a news outlet going forward.
 
Beautiful....

Conned: Road to Trump impeachment may have begun with Giuliani getting played by Ukrainian prosecutor:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...uliani-getting-played-by-ukrainian-prosecutor

"President Trump faces impeachment because personal attorney Rudy Giuliani was manipulated by a disreputable official who hoped to avoid being fired by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, according to regional analysts and anti-corruption activists.

“Consider the notion that Rudy Giuliani, who is no fool, was conned,” a U.S.-based Central European policy specialist who is active in Ukrainian issues told the Washington Examiner.

A consensus has been forming for months, in both Ukraine and in the U.S. government, that Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko, who earned the distrust of local anti-corruption activists during his three years in office, lured President Trump's personal lawyer into a rash pursuit of dirt on Democrats that could ultimately bring the American president down.

Lutsenko, 54, convinced Giuliani that he had evidence of corruption involving former Vice President Joe Biden. But his back channel meetings are widely perceived as an attempt to forge the kind of political alliance with Trump that would make it difficult for Zelensky to oust him....

....“The president has done things ... based on his obvious presumption that there is something to be found about Hunter Biden and Hillary Clinton in Ukraine,” said the Central European specialist. “What if there's no there there? It means, then, that Giuliani may have drawn Trump into a situation which is, politically, extraordinarily damaging — for no purpose.”

I'm beginning to think there are CIA assets in the Ukrainian Government that set up Giuliani to go and deliver bad info to Trump knowing full well he would turn around and do something idiotic like this.
 
I'm beginning to think there are CIA assets in the Ukrainian Government that set up Giuliani to go and deliver bad info to Trump knowing full well he would turn around and do something idiotic like this.

There is so much stink on this not to question if it's inside. My pet theory is Trump set the whole thing in motion to spotlight Biden. The fools around here are proof enough that it plays right into the swing voters he's going for. Will it hurt him more or help him by exposing more media and left wing fanaticism?
 
Not particularly, no.

It's too ****ing ridiculous to be made up.

Does this strike you as ridiculous?

Chuck Schumer threatens Trump right on TV.



Then the CIA spies on Tru errrrr.... gossipblows Trump.

The real corruption right out in front, and all the MSM has to do is frame it however they want, and then the shills do the rest.


You are right this **** is too ridiculous.
 
Back
Top