What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

JazzyFresh said:
What we could do is put the inquiry to a vote that allows both parties equal access to said whistleblower. Well the whistleblower wasn't even there so let's also put the one who leaked most likely classified info to said whistleblower on the podium.


Seems fair right? Then we could get actual answers instead of hearsay? It's obvious the Democratic party doesn't want that.
Click to expand...
We could do lots of things.
Alas, there is a procedure already in place (this isn't the first impeachment inquiry on history) and that is the procedure being used.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
JazzyFresh said:
Look no further than the Steele dossier paid for by Hillary. Funny nobody gives a **** Hillary paid Steele, a foreign agent,, for dirt on Trump.
Click to expand...
That's a completely different type of situation! I'll give
fishonjazz said:
Binded by Justice? If you want Justice then you should want the investigation to continue unimpeded. You don't want Justice though. You want your team to win.

Lol his enemies.
That's what I would call the cops if had committed a crime and they were after me. Or what I would call the prosecutor if I had committed a crime.

As for your last question, I would say investigate to your hearts content. How can I help?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
I did not say I was blinded by justice. I said that I would say that if you admitted that you were blinded by hate (which you didn't). It was a clumsy way of putting it, but I'm not blind to the facts. I just think that your "facts" are wrong.

On your second point, it's pretty clear that Trump's political enemies are not cops.

And LOL on me investigating you. You know it's not going to happen, but if it did I think you could also admit that you will have had enough after three years.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
You believe that the transcript is inaccurate and that Trump somehow meddled with it? If that was the case don't you think that someone else who was on the call would have held up their hand and said, "Wait just a second!" Remember, Trump supporters weren't the only people listening. In other words, your accusation simply doesn't hold water.
Click to expand...

Oh, that's totally on me-- I thought Trump's people generated and released the transcript. Thanks for pointing that out. My bad.

I'm still not sure how a discrepancy in the number of times the name "Biden" was said is particularly relevant, though. If you think it really is, why not apply the same generous logical standard to what many believe was pretty clearly implied by Trump's statements in the transcript, i.e. "But I want you to do us a favor..."? How, in the larger context of withholding military aid, etc., does that not at least make you think it ought to be investigated as potential extortion/quid pro quo?
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
If I decide that you ought to be investigated are you somehow admitting your guilt by saying, "Take a hike!"
Click to expand...

If the person being investigated is a public official, and the subject of the investigation is related to actions taken in the fulfillment of that person's official duties, then yes-- absolutely. How not?
 
Jazzta said:
LOOOOOOL

Zombie, perhaps the Bidens didn’t commit a crime because of how embedded the federal law is with corporate law. But to come out blabbing about Trump’s ties to Russia while his son Hunter was getting paid $50000/month while being on the board of a Russian state sponsored oil company is beyond bull****. Let’s get real here, is this about integrity or is it about replacing Trump with just another POS corrupt politician.
Click to expand...
Yeah, maybe settle down. I'm not at all a Biden supporter, and I wish we lived in a world where family members of politicians couldn't use their proximity to power to make money.

But he said they committed crimes, and I want to know which ones.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Could you explain this procedure? If I'm not mistaken both Bill and Dick were afforded an impeachment inquiry vote
Click to expand...
Hey just an FYI the constitution doesn't require a vote before an inquiry, and specifically states the House has sole authority to impeach the president, meaning they get to set the terms. All this crying about process is just that, a tantrum.
 
Zombie said:
Hey just an FYI the constitution doesn't require a vote before an inquiry, and specifically states the House has sole authority to impeach the president, meaning they get to set the terms. All this crying about process is just that, a tantrum.
Click to expand...
Lol asking for equal opportunity is a tantrum. Coming from the guy tantruming daily about Trump.
 
Zombie said:
They don't have an equal share of power in the House. Maybe they should have won more votes. I suggest you cry about it.
Click to expand...
You suggest I cry? Why? I've watched you cry for 3+ years and you still haven't gotten your way. Hell you're balling your baby eyes out as we speak. Poor kid got his feeling hurt by Trump.
 
JazzyFresh said:
You suggest I cry? Why? I've watched you cry for 3+ years and you still haven't gotten your way. Hell you're balling your baby eyes out as we speak. Poor kid got his feeling hurt by Trump.
Click to expand...
On the contrary I'm quite pleased Trump is going to be impeached.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top