D
The official "let's impeach Trump" thread
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Someone thought up something bad that Trump (or in this case someone associated with Trump) could have done so they published it with no evidence and now we need to debate whether it might be true? Think about how ridiculous this has gotten.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Does it seem at all odd to you that he didn't recall these "facts" when testifying the first time? What a clown show.
Side note: I just learned a couple of days ago that Ken Tremendous is Michael Schur, writer for Parks & Rec and The Office, and creator of Brooklyn 99 and The Good Place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Schur
Yes. He was clearly not telling the truth initially, but then after several other people testified about those events under oath he decided he should fix his earlier testimony so he doesn't get charged with perjury.
Zombie
Well-Known Member
It's almost like he lied the first time, and then he was caught in that lie. Puzzling indeed.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Dammit! These private hearings are so corrupt! Not fair!
Dammit! These public hearings are so corrupt! Not fair!
Basically, Republicans just want no accountability politics, where Trump is dictator for life.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Funny how criminals suddenly remember stuff better when others have corroborated to the crime that they lied about committing.
Red
Well-Known Member
Singing the Deep State blues.....
Schiff: Listen, I'm speaking for the Deep State when I tell you how much better things will be for you, if you're willing to edit your deposition just a bit.
Sondland: But President Trump is a great man. He wanted to be sure Ukraine had gotten its act together. All he thinks about 24/7 is how he can protect and defend the best interests of the country he loves.
Schiff: Tell us something we don't know. He's good. We're evil. I get it. But we're the Deep State, this is what we do when threatened by a great man who's trying to drain our swamp. We need an edit from you.
Sondland: Alright, but history will judge your treachery!
Schiff: We don't care. We hate America. We will not allow a great man to stand in our way. We are the Deep State.
Schiff: Listen, I'm speaking for the Deep State when I tell you how much better things will be for you, if you're willing to edit your deposition just a bit.
Sondland: But President Trump is a great man. He wanted to be sure Ukraine had gotten its act together. All he thinks about 24/7 is how he can protect and defend the best interests of the country he loves.
Schiff: Tell us something we don't know. He's good. We're evil. I get it. But we're the Deep State, this is what we do when threatened by a great man who's trying to drain our swamp. We need an edit from you.
Sondland: Alright, but history will judge your treachery!
Schiff: We don't care. We hate America. We will not allow a great man to stand in our way. We are the Deep State.
And yet completely believable, this was being reported on the ABC yesterday (australia's bbc) couched in language of single source.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
My recollection was that Schiff et al were salivating over the things Sondland initially said. They considered him to be a very cooperative, supportive witness. Your claim is that he was somehow trying to protect the president in that earlier testimony and now he's become convinced to tell the truth? I admit that I am not hanging on every word of this process like some people around here seem to be, but the claim that he suddenly remembered such a central meeting in this entire thing strikes me as incredibly odd.