A few related tweets
You are so unhinged.
According to what I heard there were people there whose goal was to keep the statues in place. I've spent quite a bit of time in small southern communities and can tell you that they take great pride in their history, even with respect to things they may have done wrong in the past. Do you have some sort of evidence that your supposedly explicitly stated goal was the only reason that anyone supported that side?
If (or should I say when) there are marches to remove statues of patriots like Washington, Jefferson, Adams, etc. because they did not denounce slavery I would be on the side of those who want the statues to remain, even if there are white nationalists and other putrid groups who also happen to align on that side of the argument. My reasoning for supporting my side of the debate will be completely unrelated to the goals of these fringe groups. Just because they might occasionally support the same cause that I do does not mean we are in alignment. I would assume and hope the same would be true for you when it comes to an issue that the extreme left is aligned with.
Trump is justly concerned about endless litigation based on nothing at all. It's been purposed opposition and meant to prevent him from being effective in his elective office, and it's an inconscionable effort to disenfranchise American voters and destroy the American electoral system.
People who support this campaign are immoral and un-American.
dawnyle has never been afraid of endless litigation, not a single day in his life. Pretending that he is merely enables his political motives.
Clean it up. And keep it tidy.
How often do white nationalists arguments align with progressives? I’ll wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I doubt there is any largely successful person in any field who doesn't know the ropes in manipulating issues and playing rhetorical charades, and I would appreciate seeing less of it myself. What concerns me most in this Trumpdumpsterism is the complete failure of his accusers to raise the appropriate arguments with their own skunks. It is therefore a shameless and hypocritical attack on Trump.
There is, in any extreme position, a certain amount of paid performers who are actually in it merely for their pay. I have no doubts George Soros is paying about half of all and most of the very vocal actors who could be called, in any stretch of the term, "White Nationalists". I think there are also some recluse offthegrid folks who really prefer their heritage and culture and have not really accepted the native Americans, or any other ethnic or culture, but they are not organized and have no actual hatred of any "class". I mean, they would hire and welcome a different sort of human without much hesitance, they just want to preserve their own, generally.
Those who wish to exploit the issue politically are another kind of human beings entirely, shameless, hypocritical and liars, and probably are in fact "progressive" agitators. The shameless lying that is essential to being an effector advocate of progressivism presents no barriers to paying fools to show up at some damn rally with signs and/or baseball bats, tire chains, razors and spray paint.
How often do communists arguments align with conservatives? I'll wait too.How often do white nationalists arguments align with progressives? I’ll wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk