Yup, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation. Ignoring.
He never has. But he's not the "flood you with stupid **** until you submit without trying to grasp your POV" guy, so I give him a chance.
Yup, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation. Ignoring.
His position is absurd. The last two administrations have had the opportunity to assassinate Soleimani and they both passed, because they figured it wasn't worth the blowback. And here's an idea- maybe Iran wouldn't be helping insurgents in Iraq attack American troops if we hadn't sent them there and destabilized the entire region.You're the armchair tough guy though aren't you? Assassinating their top general was a great way to get thousands of Americans killed and plunge a region into war. Way too risky.
Yup, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation. Ignoring.
You're delusional. Who in their right mind can blame Trump, or any other head of state for that matter, for responding to Iranian aggression? Only a half-witted TDS sufferer.
Iran has repeatedly attacked the United States and other countries. Can you hide your tail any further under your balls as you run and cower in some dark corner away from Iran?
Warmonger.
Coward
You're so brave. Want a medal?
Look at you sounding all reasonable and stuff. Keep it up!
Your daily reminder that confessional Republicans are by and large awful human beings.