The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by colton, Jul 16, 2019.

  1. DasJazz

    DasJazz Well-Known Member

    1,965
    918
    148
    Dec 18, 2016
    In so many words, sure. Now, you specifically haven't quite taken this leap of outright name calling that I have seen. However, if someone has an opposing view to the left or supports the president in any way here we are labeled, oh let's see, what I have been called: Racist, Bigot, Nazi, Anti-semitic, the list goes on. All of which are completely false.

    That's a whole lot of ******** and highly unnecessary just because I and a few others have conservative views. It does not bring positive dialogue to the table and that's what we really should all want and promote.

    So yes, in many ways here, we are in fact told, no you aren't allowed to think for yourself.
     
    jazzrule, JazzyFresh and Heathme like this.
  2. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,187
    9,928
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    This post has nothing to do with me or what we were discussing so whatever.


    Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
     
  3. Jazzta

    Jazzta Well-Known Member

    2,166
    1,272
    218
    Jul 25, 2017
    Trump, so that things get broken quicker.
     
  4. Heathme

    Heathme Well-Known Member

    980
    286
    113
    May 26, 2010
    More of this with liberals in charge...

     
    jazzrule likes this.
  5. Heathme

    Heathme Well-Known Member

    980
    286
    113
    May 26, 2010
     
  6. Safetydan

    Safetydan Well-Known Member

    811
    220
    93
    May 26, 2010
    Do you have a handy flowchart that helps you decide what thread to post your tasty little propaganda smidgets?
     
  7. Heathme

    Heathme Well-Known Member

    980
    286
    113
    May 26, 2010
     
  8. Joe Bagadonuts

    Joe Bagadonuts Well-Known Member

    10,039
    1,466
    228
    Aug 23, 2010
    This is a tweet she sent out before the 2016 election, right?

    No wait... she's doing it again?

    She ought to just rerun her content from several years ago and take a vacation from screeching.
     
  9. Stoked

    Stoked Well-Known Member Contributor 2018 Award Winner

    38,803
    5,463
    388
    Dec 13, 2011
    Is the content she’s repeating factually wrong?
     
  10. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,187
    9,928
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Doesn't matter. It could be seen as a trump diss and therefore must be attacked.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
    Stoked likes this.
  11. JazzyFresh

    JazzyFresh Well-Known Member

    3,605
    1,135
    178
    Feb 19, 2015
    Maybe... Can you provide proof that these numbers are factually correct? It's a poll of approximately 250,000 people. I think it's pretty safe to say that it's wrong in one way or the other when 130+ million people vote in elections. I know this is about "being under water" and not votes but a little over 250,000 votes tells only a very very very very minute side of the story. It's fluff imo. I would expect her to do better.
     
  12. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,187
    9,928
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    That's not how it works. The tweet isn't predicting anything. It's just saying the results of a poll. So the tweet could be 100% right about the poll results and still wrong about the future actual election.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
    Safetydan likes this.
  13. JazzyFresh

    JazzyFresh Well-Known Member

    3,605
    1,135
    178
    Feb 19, 2015
    She's saying "Trump underwater in"

    250,000 people doesn't tell the whole story, not even a fraction. Where do these 250,000 votes come from? You actually have to register to the website to vote in that poll. You really think that's accurate?

    Edit- it's actually closer to 270,000 but that changes nothing.
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2019
  14. JazzyFresh

    JazzyFresh Well-Known Member

    3,605
    1,135
    178
    Feb 19, 2015
    On average that would be about 5400 people polled per state. That is in no way a fair representation. For all we know only 12 people were polled in Utah.
     
  15. Safetydan

    Safetydan Well-Known Member

    811
    220
    93
    May 26, 2010
    Statistics are hard huh. :(
     
    The Thriller and Zombie like this.
  16. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,187
    9,928
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    The poll is showing how the people who took the poll felt or at least what they are saying they felt (since they could also be lying)
    That's it.
    I think you are making too big of a deal about it for some reason

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
  17. fishonjazz

    fishonjazz Well-Known Member Contributor 2019 Award Winner 2018 Award Winner

    54,187
    9,928
    388
    Nov 4, 2010
    Did the poll say it was a fair representation? Is the poll saying that it represents every voter in America?


    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
     
  18. JazzyFresh

    JazzyFresh Well-Known Member

    3,605
    1,135
    178
    Feb 19, 2015
    Not as hard as having a conversation without petty insults
     
  19. JazzyFresh

    JazzyFresh Well-Known Member

    3,605
    1,135
    178
    Feb 19, 2015
    Meh I think she's being disingenuous.
     
  20. Safetydan

    Safetydan Well-Known Member

    811
    220
    93
    May 26, 2010
    I think you are dude. She forwarded the poll results that she thought were interesting and cited the link. According to the poll, Trump was underwater in those states at the time. Were they not? Did she misrepresent the poll results in some way? Did she obfuscate where the poll comes from? Does the poll itself not publish the uncertainty range? Is 270,000 not a large enough sample size to reasonably represent the population? It actually is. Please go learn some math. Maybe the survey questions were biased? No?

    The poll was given online which means the sample was self-selected. This may introduce bias since usually the passionate are compelled to respond. This is an argument you could have made if you knew how to make it.

    Poll results are poll results, that's all that they are bro. Why are you punching at shadows?
     
    The Thriller and fishonjazz like this.

Share This Page