The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[JazzyFresh]

Of course everyone should use critical thinking when reading the news. Even when the sources for the story are known.

With that in mind you'd have to be an absolute moron to believe Trump was happy about Mulvaney saying loudly and clearly that a Ukrainian investigation into the DNC was part of a quid pro quo for military aid.

I really don't care actually. I think it's petty as **** to get bent out of shape over something so stupid but that happens daily here. I'm just pointing out what I consider **** news. Hearsay.

 

[Zombie]

I really don't care actually. I think it's petty as **** to get bent out of shape over something so stupid but that happens daily here. I'm just pointing out what I consider **** news. Hearsay.

I'm not sure anyone here is getting bent out of shape.

 

[JazzyFresh]

He's not the main witness. He's the guy who made the 911 call after he heard there was a crime.

Would it be nice to get his testimony? Sure.

But we're well past the point of the whistleblower being the lynch pin of the investigation.

Seems like excuses to me. They are obviously hiding something. Crazy thing is that Trump has been the only transparent one here. He released the actual transcripts, now what transparency has the left afforded? Nothing...

 

[colton]

Judge Napolitano agrees with me.

 

[JazzyFresh]

I'm not sure anyone here is getting bent out of shape.

Disagree.

 

[colton]

If Pence goes down as well, which I find extremely unlikely, Nancy Pelosi would become president.

Only if they go down simultaneously. If Trump goes down first then Pence will immediately appoint a Veep. If Pence goes down first (highly unlikely) then Trump will similarly immediately replace him. Simultaneity could only be achieved, as far as I know, if the Senate considers them as co-defendants and has a joint conviction vote.

 

[colton]

Haha. Love it when a plan doesn't come together...

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/17/politics/trump-unhappy-mulvaney-quid-pro-quo/index.html

(CNN)President Donald Trump is not pleased with acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney's press briefing and his acknowledgment on Thursday of a quid pro quo, according to a source close to the President.

"He was not happy," the source said.

Mulvaney shocked reporters when he admitted the Trump administration had held up military funding to Ukraine to press the country to investigate the handling of a Democratic National Committee server hacked in the 2016 election. When told that he had described a quid pro quo arrangement for the military funding, Mulvaney said, "We do that all the time with foreign policy" and later added, "Get over it. There's going to be political influence in foreign policy."

This is crazy!

Not that they did it, that much was obvious, but that Mulvaney should tell the truth about it.

 

[fishonjazz]

Great input. I question your smartness as you never add anything intellectual just childish insults. Never...

Smartness lol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[colton]

Only if they go down simultaneously. If Trump goes down first then Pence will immediately appoint a Veep. If Pence goes down first (highly unlikely) then Trump will similarly immediately replace him. Simultaneity could only be achieved, as far as I know, if the Senate considers them as co-defendants and has a joint conviction vote.

Which, btw, of course the Senate would not do because of the Republican majority. So it's not going to happen.

 

[Zombie]

Only if they go down simultaneously. If Trump goes down first then Pence will immediately appoint a Veep. If Pence goes down first (highly unlikely) then Trump will similarly immediately replace him. Simultaneity could only be achieved, as far as I know, if the Senate considers them as co-defendants and has a joint conviction vote.

Indeed, which is why I think it's extremely unlikely. Trump getting kicked out of office, while seemingly becoming more likely every day, still seems like a long shot.

 

[Gameface]

If Pence goes down as well, which I find extremely unlikely, Nancy Pelosi would become president.

Man that would be owning the Cons pretty hard. LOL.

I mean I'd have to hunker down because Trumpers would probably start rioting, but I'd be laughing my *** off.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Smartness lol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

You are pretty dumb dude. You don't even know simple words. Damn dude, maybe take a break, read a children book and come back with something intellectual. I dare you.