Zombie
Well-Known Member
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.Has she cried yet?
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.Has she cried yet?
That vote was on November 2. How many lies do you intend to repeat today?
Still gotta have evidence. Can't just say, "HE EXTORTED" and get a conviction.
None. Where did I indicate a problem? I brought up what I thought was an amusing parallel between the speaker of the quote and the POTUS you are defending.
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.
They voted on procedures. Not an OFFICIAL inquiry. If it was an official inquiry, then Republicans would be able to call their own witnesses.
You really can't stand me, can you?
They willWell, have articles of impeachment been written? Have they taken a vote on impeach or not?
Well then, there is no impeachment.
They haven't even voted to start the inquiry yet.
Voice recording since it was a phone call would be one thing.What would be evidence for extortion that would not rely on witness testimony? Can you give an example?