idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
The fact is this dumbass story spread by dumb sheeple is completely false, purposefully deceptive, and outright fabrication. But that doesn't stop the fanatics from thumping their anti trump gospel truths.
The official "let's impeach Trump" thread
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
The fact is this dumbass story spread by dumb sheeple is completely false, purposefully deceptive, and outright fabrication. But that doesn't stop the fanatics from thumping their anti trump gospel truths.
So, you got nothing?
idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
Now the sheeple want us to prove a negative.
God is real bro cuz harambegamefacesilesian say so. Prove them wrong. This is dumb.
Political Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
If you’re “Never Trump” and Bernie gets the nomination, are you voting for him?
See, NOW you're catching on.
I'll continue to believe the best information available, thanks.
Political Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
believing, or advocating "the best information available" is, logically, equivalent to believing and advocating a religion.
you're not caring if it's true or not, so long as it's "trending" or has cred as "the best" at hand. People who care more if something is true might do less advocacy and less hating, but it is pretty certain they will do more thinking.
Science in it's basic setup, doesn't "believe" in anything but a process for challenging "the best" theory or explanation currently available.
It also falls short as a method for establishing truth, or Truth.... as some would like it to be.....because it cannot declare anything as "established" beyond all question.
Every article I've even been involved in, and most that I've read in peer-reviewed publications, begins with a survey of various previously published papers with results that point to a new or familiar question that is to be addressed with the presented paper.
While it is rare for fundamental or long-held or widely-accepted ideas to be overturned by a new theory, it is "Science" that provides the stage for doing so.
you're not caring if it's true or not, so long as it's "trending" or has cred as "the best" at hand. People who care more if something is true might do less advocacy and less hating, but it is pretty certain they will do more thinking.
Science in it's basic setup, doesn't "believe" in anything but a process for challenging "the best" theory or explanation currently available.
It also falls short as a method for establishing truth, or Truth.... as some would like it to be.....because it cannot declare anything as "established" beyond all question.
Every article I've even been involved in, and most that I've read in peer-reviewed publications, begins with a survey of various previously published papers with results that point to a new or familiar question that is to be addressed with the presented paper.
While it is rare for fundamental or long-held or widely-accepted ideas to be overturned by a new theory, it is "Science" that provides the stage for doing so.
Hilarious......
And I thought there was no sense of humor in our national politics today.
It's not often I'm blown away...
That's not true. And you don't care what is true. So there.
And you focused on the smallest point in my post.
You completely skipped over the part about Trump being the kind of billionaire who buys golden toilets and puts ketchup on his well done steak.
If that doesn't tell you who Trump is then nothing will.
Jazzta
Guest
From a political stance Sanders is to Trump what Stockton is to John Lucas III
you wouldn't know.
you're 100% advocate, 0% fact.
You get your education from some damn daily talking points list, and you believe **** like Snopes and other paid, as in bought and paid-for, indoctrination sites that work very hard on missing the facts and keeping in line with the propaganda.
Truth is, it's hard to actually get any facts, and harder still to actually deal with them objectively. People who keep the question open are either deliberately evading the chore, or less trigger-happy than advocates.
I'm not sure what you "advocate" exactly, because it comes off with so little thought on your part you are entirely unconcerned about your own inconsistencoes./
Maybe it's just Wilkow's "History of Now, Forget Tomorrow" theory of liberal media working on your mind. Propaganda media trying to instruct the stupid sheeple who will still listen, all fifteen of them here on JFC.
who could ever know.
The same mainstream media that could broadcast Hillary denying she deleted/destroyed subpoenaed matter from her computers, phones, and server with a brazen "What do mean, "cleaned"? I wiped them with a cloth?", and calling Mitch's handling of Trump's impeachment in open daylight "a cover-up". Pelosi found nothing impeachable, and found no evidence to support it, and it just doesn't deserve any more attention. The witnesses she had have gone into hiding, don't want to defend themselves, or be known to history.
You have never really dealt with any of the hundreds of such obvious inconsistencies while you've been beating the drums to resist, or impeach, Trump.
Look at "Xi" in China as a comparison. He's moved into Mao's old digs, which had been set aside as a historic site for while. He's reneged on the deal with Britain over Hong Kong wherein China agreed to political and judicial autonomy for Hong Kong for 50 years, he's got his secret police all over Hong Kong, he's inserted his people into the Hong Kong police, and he's got a puppet Mayor who won't stand up for the treaty requirements. I think you could actually develop some facts about how Xi is doing stuff that is abhorrent or fascist a lot easier than making up ****, or believing whatever **** there is being put out there on Trump.
what crap. stereotype images of gold-plated bathrooms has what in common with well-done steak or ketchup? People put gold lettering on family Bibles, it's cheap.
gold plated toilets probably cost less than stainless steel sinks.
There's no virtue in no ketchup on anything, nor on not cooking your steak. The meal price is the same either way.
Where do you get these bizarre notions of opulence, bro.
I'm not surprised you don't get it.
"tldr" is a common JFC slur intended to drive out actual meaningful, well-crafted treatments of any subject that doesn't promote the Party Line.
It's stupid. "Too long, did not read" means you don't care what was said, you believe you know better regardless.
I'd guess the opposite of TDR, a typo to begin with, would be something like "Thanks for Sharing This." TST.
And I think a lot of cool dudes here might start responding to threads I don't post in, with "@babe: TFN". "Thanks for Nothing".