What's new

This made me kinda sad today...

I don't see anything that I wrote which would indicate a lack of awareness of the existence of radio advertisements. I'm sure you felt you had a point by saying they exist. You failed to make it.



Again, I'm not seeing the relevance.



Young people vote at very low rates. If the Democratic base were primarily young people, Trump would have won the popular vote and the House would still be Republican.

Nice to see you are still being elitist, though.



You mean, as opposed to all the old people in the Catholic high school protest?

I'm not sure what any of this does to support your claim that "... pretty much every other big news corporation leans left". Did you lose focus?

Agree to disagree.

Do you know what else Ive noticed about the left when they protest? They are overwhelmingly white. We can debat all sorts of things, but this is undeniable. Do you agree with this statement? Thats easily provable.

Why do you think that is? Isnt it a paradoxical conundrum? People protesting white privilege while being guilty of white privilege themselves? Shouldn't they just punch themselves in the face to try and solve the problem? (metaphorically speaking)
 

"The analysis in this report draws on more than 10,000 interviews with registered voters in 2017 and tens of thousands of interviews conducted in previous years (see Methodology for additional detail)."

Republicans have to work more and raise families. They dont have as much time to participate in interviews.

Why do you think the polls were so wrong about this last election?
 
"The analysis in this report draws on more than 10,000 interviews with registered voters in 2017 and tens of thousands of interviews conducted in previous years (see Methodology for additional detail)."

Republicans have to work more and raise families. They dont have as much time to participate in interviews.
That's an absolutely ludicrous excuse. It would be equally accurate for me to say that Republicans are too stupid to understand the interview's questions.
 
That's an absolutely ludicrous excuse. It would be equally accurate for me to say that Republicans are too stupid to understand the interview's questions.

Really? Absurd?

The 2016 election polls were crazy wrong were they not? Why is it so hard to believe these studies could be off? What's the difference?
 
Really? Absurd?

The 2016 election polls were crazy wrong were they not? Why is it so hard to believe these studies could be off? What's the difference?
I am not aware of anybody with ANY credibility (i.e. NOT YOU) that has ever suggested the polls were wrong because Republicans work too hard. That's insane troll logic.
 
I am not aware of anybody with ANY credibility (i.e. NOT YOU) that has ever suggested the polls were wrong because Republicans work too hard. That's insane troll logic.

How else could they be so wrong? Its simple logic. Republicans were missing from the polls somehow.
 
I am not aware of anybody with ANY credibility (i.e. NOT YOU) that has ever suggested the polls were wrong because Republicans work too hard. That's insane troll logic.

I am also speaking from experience. I have had to turn away opportunities to participate in studies and political polls on several occasions because I was too busy at work to do it.
 
I gave an alternate explanation.

I didn't really believe it until this conversation, though.

Maybe the polls were conducted by Democrats and they were too stupid to ask the question correctly.

I just gave you an alternate ending to your alternate explanation.
 
Maybe the polls were conducted by Democrats and they were too stupid to ask the question correctly.

I just gave you an alternate ending to your alternate explanation.
You basically just responded with, "I know you are, but what am I?" Weak sauce, man.
 
Back
Top