LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
This is all hindsight, though. At the time, Kanter was more time sensitive as an asset. Same thing with this season. Everybody knew Rudy deserved the starting role, but Utah was trying not to lose Kanter for nothing. To me, that suggests that the coach and GM are on the same page, otherwise if it was just about winning, I'd have to believe that Quin would have made the change sooner.
Of course it is hindsight, but also insight into different philosophies. And if it were purely a question of Kanter plays OR Rudy plays and there was no other factors that is dead on. But there was no reason both Kanter and Gobert couldn't have gotten minutes last season at the expense of playing rented vets. But imo Corbin inherited a belief that young players are best developed by spending a few seasons watching before playing, and I disagree with that philosophy. Look at Williams playing behind McLeod and Palacio of all people. You might say it lit a fire in him to compete. You could also say it was minutes wasted on a 2nd year guard over your star rookie PG, while the other star guard from that draft was handed the reigns and leapt to the top. You could also say that lighting that fire also lit a fire of resentment when he saw how crappy the 2 guys were getting minutes ahead of him.
It's gotta be tailored to the player, and the same rigid system does not work for every player. But imo cutting a young players minutes, unless he or the team obviously will not benefit from it (like for perennial D league players or if your team is already a contender) does more to hurt development than help it.