What's new

Thread for responding to transphobic comments

The people that want to castrate and mutilate children callings others pedo... Think about that brilliance right there. I'm against pedophilia I can say that loud and clear. Hell I even agree with Trump that these sick vermin be publicly executed. Make an example out of them... Make them think twice. That's the difference between us. I find both to be equally grotesque. I want to PROTECT children not permanently harm them before having a fully functional brain. You guys can't even admit that.
 
Last edited:
And weird to think of child genitalia as sexual like you are @Safetydan . We are adults here. It's anatomy, that's all I'll say about that.

Seeing how all you guys have is insults now just shows I am right.
 
And weird to think of child genitalia as sexual like you are @Safetydan . We are adults here. It anatomy, that's all I'll say about that.
Hey hey, I'm not the one in here posting non-stop about it, sir. You don't know it, but the only thing you're defending here is your tenuous grasp on the English language and pedophilia-adjacent talking points. I firmly believe that any decisions regarding medical care are between doctors and their patients and of course, in the case of minors, the parents as well.
 
Hey hey, I'm not the one in here posting non-stop about it, sir. You don't know it, but the only thing you're defending here is your tenuous grasp on the English language and pedophilia-adjacent talking points. I firmly believe that any decisions regarding medical care are between doctors and their patients and of course, in the case of minors, the parents as well.
And you're entitled to that opinion. Me? I'm sick of your type attacking children and I'm adamant about that. Call me names and bully all you want but I/we am going nowhere. The tides are shifting. You will not bully us protecting kids into submission with your false pedophile and transphobe childness. It's just not going to work.

I have said nothing wrong and not one of you can even say where I have said anything wrong with my stance on 18 and over. That's the crazy thing. You just bully by calling me a pedophile for not wanting underage kids chopped to bits. Crazy world man..
 
Last edited:
I we am going nowhere too
Who's we exactly? The ones who want to castrate children? You're just angry for no reason. You can't give me a single stance of mine that is wrong . Think about that. You can't even tell me what your stance is or where I'm wrong yet you're angry.

I pointed out how you and onebrow opey lied for whatever reason. And that I think 10-17 year olds are too young to make such decisions. Just like with drinking, smoking, tattoos, and such. How is that wrong? Explain it
 
Last edited:
Who's we exactly? The ones who want to castrate children?
When you say "castrate" without adding "chemically", it means removal of the gonads. No serious person (henceforth abbreviated "no one") supports that. When you accuse others of mutilations they don't support, it makes you read like an unhinged lunatic. If 'unhinged lunatic' is your goal, good job. If 'person trying to make a passionate yet persuasive argument' is your goal, you're failing miserably, and cutting off any chance at a serious conversation.

No one wants give a cancer patient a double mastectomy, but you do it sometimes anyway in order to give them a better chance at a long life. Some patients even choose that before they have cancer, based on their genetics. No one wants to chemically castrate kids, or even give them puberty blockers, but doctors and parents who do are trying to make their lives better

You can't give me a single stance of mine that is wrong .
False accusations are wrong. Assuming you know better than the doctors who are treating kids is wrong. Focusing on the cases that don't work out, to the exclusion of the cases that work very well, is wrong. Relying on confessionals from unprofessional "experts" is wrong. Claiming you've found errors when you're misrepresenting positions is wrong.

Since you asked.

I pointed out how you and onebrow opey lied
Except, you failed to quote any lie, at all.

And that I think 10-17 year olds are too young to make such decisions.
I agree. That's why they have multiple doctors and their parents involved. Further, I agree any surgeries of any sort are an extreme measure, and should be viewed with the greatest of caution.
 
@Safetydan you'll absolutely looooove this.

Teacher Debra Rosenquist, works at the Terryville Road Elementary School in the Brookhaven-Comsewogue School District, and was named along with the superintendent, Jennifer J. Quinn, and the principal, Annemarie V. Sciove, in a suit filed on Jan. 23.

The suit claims the student, who was assigned female at birth and identifies as female, was targeted by her teacher, Rosenquist, throughout the 2021-2022 school year. Rosenquist began to use a male name and pronouns for the student, the suit says. The plaintiff student and parents' anonymity were maintained in the lawsuit.

"As a result, [the student] became confused as to her gender. Despite knowing about Rosenquist’s conduct…, it took the District, [Superintendent] Quinn, and [Principal] Sciove months to inform [her parents] about it," the suit said.

"Rosenquist pursued her own agenda outside the curriculum, which included persuading her 5th-grade students to try ‘being gay’ or being another gender even when they were not. To further her agenda, Rosenquist read and provided her students graphic books about gender and sexuality which were not on the curriculum," the suit said.
 
Another lawsuit filing? I never thought you had so much respect for the integrity of lawyers.
Wow, you completely just dismissed his post. Exactly what I have talking about.

An article that goes into detail:


This is what the Florida Law is seeking to prevent. What is the appropriate age that teachers should be able discuss this with students. Obviously 5th graders can be affected by this discussion.
 
Wow, you completely just dismissed his post. Exactly what I have talking about.
Actually, I dismissed the ability to rely on the accuracy of a lawsuit finding. Do you think that lawsuit filings are a reliable source of information?

An article that goes into detail:
I read an almost identical article in the NY Post before I made my comment.

I know you're a fan of people bringing evidence to the discussion, and I've no doubt you hold your newspaper sources to the same standard. So, it must have been my failure when I could not find one bit of supporting evidence in the DailyMail article (nor in the NY Post article, for that matter). No screenshots of the Instagram page or Facebook page the lawsuit mentions. No paperwork from the school acknowledging the issues that were allegedly acknowledged. The whole article read to me as if it was cribbing from the lawsuit, with no effort at all. That surely could not be true, not with @Bucknutz quoting it. I must have missed some supporting evidence. Could you point out where in the article I can find this supporting evidence?

This is what the Florida Law is seeking to prevent.
Evidence-free lawsuits?

What is the appropriate age that teachers should be able discuss this with students.
I think trans or non-binary people can be appropriate to discuss at any age. My niece and nephew (7 and 8) know I have a non-binary child, and it's not an issue for them.

Obviously 5th graders can be affected by this discussion.
Perhaps the parents misrepresented the wishes of their daughter. You don't know, and neither do I. Do you always judge so hastily?
 
Back
Top