In this I find my greatest objection to faith. To me, at it's foundation faith is an act of denying and avoiding reality. You must first accept the fact that reality is not really real by accepting a supernatural and intelligent role in creating reality. That essentially means that the same supernatural entity (God) can change reality at any moment. That it is impossible to really know anything, because after all, you cannot know the mind of God. You must also accept that your perception, your ability to think and reason based on actual reality, is flawed. You have to already accept that God can be real before you can find out that He is real. Then, the way in which you find out that God is real is just that you know, or have a feeling in your bosom, or some other self-reassuring sensation that allows you not to actually know, but to feel good about your effort to actively deceive yourself and evade reality.
So in essence faith is the rejection of one's own mind. Rejection that the way in which we, as intelligent beings, interact with the world should be the result of thinking and reasoning. Rejection of our individual responsibility to understand this world as it is, rather than the way we wish, hope or desire that it is.
Anyone can convince them self of any fantasy they desire if they try hard enough and actively evade the facts that contradict their fantasy.
That's my take, anyway.
Great point. I have the answer, well at least what I think the answer will be. "Because my beliefs are correct". How do you know? "Because God told me". And round and round we go!
This is where humanity is failing. Instead of believing in the human spirit, we have put all of our trust in the culture we were a part of. In essence, we are all products of our culture and if that culture is to worship a giant monkey, well then, you're all going to hell because that giant monkey is God and he told us that our sacrifices of bananas was a true practice.
The issue I have with this philosophical approach is I don't see how it would not all boil down to situational ethics that can and should change with the tide. This is how the world operated up until the Great American Experiment. I prefer at least a minimal standard as opposed to "understand this world as it is, rather than the way we wish, hope or desire that it is." The latter can be a messy road when society accepts the way things are. Thoughts?
Why not appeal to the greatest tool we have for life, our minds? Why make us reject what we know and accept something that we don't and cannot know?
What proof would you consider a sign of God? Gravity has been enough for me (although I'd appreciate reading the atheist perspective). The simple fact that the big bang led to the perfect rate of expansion, something like a one in a trillion chance, is pretty damn phenomenal. How does that happen without control? And what exactly is gravity anyway? God's glue is just as descriptive as any scientific pondering.