Who could vote for this monster who knowingly put Americans in death's path when he fully knew of the upcoming attack, and who now refuses to avenge this Libyan slaughter because the SaltyDawg's of the world will be forced to acknowledge his "I killed al-Qaeda" pr lies? Just like Bill Clinton, this strategy does wonders to defuse foreign terrorism.
Top Five Worst Obamacare Taxes Coming in 2013
- Thread starter Scat
- Start date
Who could vote for this monster who knowingly put Americans in death's path when he fully knew of the upcoming attack, and who now refuses to avenge this Libyan slaughter because the SaltyDawg's of the world will be forced to acknowledge his "I killed al-Qaeda" pr lies? Just like Bill Clinton, this strategy does wonders to defuse foreign terrorism.
Seriously?
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
What, hasn't Fox News been reporting about all the dead al qaida leaders? And bin laden's seized journals/notes where he talked about how the drone attacks were hurting them?
I took 4 seconds and found 4 Fox stories.
Tell that to the families of the Libyan embassy employees.
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
So there have been like 4 deaths from al qaida terrorist attacks, all on foreign soil (in areas that haven't been friendly to Americans in a long time), in the 4 years of Obama's presidency? Boy, that al qaida is at an all time threat level.
You left out American. They have also killed more than 4. We could tak about their involvement in Iraq or about how many non Americans they are killing.
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Yes, I'm sure the level of non Americans killed by al qaida is also currently at an all time high...
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Yeah, because when Bush was president al qaida leaders were dropping like flies...
I like how you go from 4 being high t flippantly discounting the dozens/hundreds of non Americans killed. Classy
Are you implying that only Al Qaida is a terror threat?
What about Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Shabab, the Taliban...
Can we count the 2,000+ American troops killed in Afghanistan?
I like you but sometimes you are fakely dense.
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Those other organizations are terrorists, yes, but we didn't have this "war on terror" to stop them. It was al qaida we were after. And you know this.
And the troops killed in Afghanistan are unfortunate, but they are there fighting a war. They knew what they were signing up for. So while it's unfortunate, and I'd like to see them brought home, it's not the same as an average Joe getting killed when some terrorist blows up an office building.
Non Americans being killed by Hamas/Hezbollah/whoever are not the responsibility of the American president and was never the focus of the "war on terror" (nor should it have been). Our focus was to reduce the threat on American soil and to destroy al qaida.
Obama has been hugely successful at this. And that's why I doubt Romney will bring it up during the debate (which is what my post to Franklin implied, when I responded to him saying he hopes Romney brings it up).
If you really can't comprehend this, then you have no business calling anyone else dense.
Last edited:
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Hilarious how you have time to argue ridiculous points like this one and yet don't respond to legit questions like these:
This is the problem with you and your ilk. You'll argue over a certain point, typically social issues like marriage and abortion, or you'll blend the whole ME into one (as you just did), and ignore the mistakes and issues that your own party has caused. You'll argue with Salty over Obama being "insensitive" to a few folks killed in the latest uprising while not addressing the YEARS of Constitution bulldozing, trillion dollar spending, and pathetic leadership that your party, President, and Congress gave us for nearly 8 years!
If you folks want to have any credibility, ANSWER these basic questions which I have asked at least 3 times in this thread.
If you folks want to be taken seriously, stop just picking and choosing lil one liners/social issues/religious stands and ACTUALLY COME UP WITH A DAMN SOLUTION FOR SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS!
If you folks want votes, then admit that you've made mistakes and will change them. That's why Romney isn't winning! It's so simple! When people see him, they see Bush III. They don't see a repentant GOP, who has learned a lesson from their last *** kicking in 08. They see an even more stubborn GOP primed and ready to give out more entitlements to the rich/wall street, start more wars, spend endlessly in defense, and recklessly pass more unconstitutional legislation to monitor social issues "for our defense." Your policies, which got us into this ****hole of a mess, haven't changed! Instead, they've become even worse!
When folks see Romney, they don't see the moderate politician who will unite the country. Instead, they see Bush, a religious rich wacko who will divide the country even further.
Oh, and btw, I'm white and Mormon. So we can't use race or religion as reasons for my Romney dislike. This is one Mormon who sees abortion and gay marriage not nearly as important as our economy, affordable health care, affordable education, immigration policy that makes sense (sorry, but can't racially profile everyone and then deport everyone and their dog who has an accent), and defense spending/war mongering.
Last edited:
Yeah, like that'll happen.
Nah, I've learned to enjoy the Rachel Maddow of our board. Predictably lambasting those who dare nitpick arguments and those who refuse to admit their own faults and only point out the inadequacies of others by nitpicking arguments and refusing to admit his own faults while pointing out the inadequacies of others. The ironing, as they say, is delicious. I observe Rachel Gatinho with the same curiosity that I watch, say, Honey Boo Boo. There is nothing of value for me, but I cannot pull myself away from watching the debacle of someone who, sadly, thinks that everyone is laughing with them.
Thats what I said when hardly any of you on the right gave him credit.
Remember all GW had to do was keep up safe from terror to be a success in 04.
We'd be foolish to say it's all on him, or course it's not. As a leader though it's ridiculous not to give Obama any credit for his success against terrorism.
I'm gonna copy and paste this into every thread.
I have no problem giving him credit for continuing to hunt down al Qaeda. My "seriously" comment was regarding Salty's assertion that al Qaeda is all but destroyed. If anyone really believes this I have a nice bridge in San Fran to sell them.
If Obama is re-elected the World is going to implode and Lizards will take over the universe.