Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Sports' started by Gyp Rosetti, Nov 11, 2012.
Good call AKMVP.
Did he think they'd be good?
Yeah, we got into an argument on them. Bill Simmons loved them going over 33 and I strongly disagreed with him. AKMVP sided with Simmons basing most of his argument on their defense, coach, and rookies. I simply looked at their history (losing) and lineup (do they have one above average player? maybe lowry) and thought they'd win more like 28-29 wins.
They have no one who can score consistently at the rim, poor shooters on the wing, and a weak defensive starting frontcourt. They're bad.
How can anyone think a team signing DeMar DeRozan to a 40 million dollar contract would be a 33 win team? Lowry and Bargnani are definitely above average, but the ship sails there.
Aren't you counting your chickens to early? They were in every game but vs OKC. Their schedule is brutal early so I totally expected poor start.
No, I'm not. They suck. Period.
They not good in any way, but to get to 34 wins they just need to go 33-43 rest of the season. So not period yet
They are not good is proper English.
Shouldn't it be "their not good"? Or is it "there not good"?
"they're not-good" ... period.
Tehy ayre knot god
They suck ass, I believe is what the kids are calling it.
You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.
They do seem to have a promising team though once they get Fields and Lowry back.
Yet it took healthy Jazz team 3 OT and miracle shot by Al to beat Raptors team who missed their best player. They will be just fine.
Fields been garbage so far, Lowry on the other hand was nr 1 rated fantasy player till injury.
Yet they are 1-6.
Big ups to Toronto - they turn around a 2 point win less than 24 hours after a 3OT game. LOL - even though they managed only 5 points in the 4th quarter - do you think they were tired?
On the road no less.