Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
If better means he gets a chance to playNot this fan. Forrest has been better (whether that qualifies as good or not is another thing.)
If better means he gets a chance to playNot this fan. Forrest has been better (whether that qualifies as good or not is another thing.)
Why don’t you just eat my nuts!!
I think we’ve convinced ourselves to be “too realistic” surrounding trade values with Smart. We’re talking about needing to send first round picks and such to land him. But this Boston reporter is talking about how his contract is hard to move, and another Boston person had suggested Smart and a pick for Clarkson. We’re talking about Clarkson plus a pick or Bojan. I just don’t think Smart’s market is as high as we’ve made it seem here. His efficiency is really bad. Then couple that with his contract extension kicking in next year and that’s a huge pill to swallow to a team on the tax (both us and Boston) and that doesn’t get nearly enough attention. We’d be paying him $21M in ‘25-‘26. Plus simply swapping Clarkson for him this year costs us like $10M or something when all is said and done with tax (haven’t officially run the numbers, I’ll leave that to someone else). There’s no way we send (or at least no way we should send) a first rounder to enter tax hell. He’d be costing us other players next year. I’d make them eat Udoka’s deal.
. I think smarts value is lower than JC at the moment. I haven't read any issues that Smart wouldn't want to come here. As he stated otherwise publicly?What about Smart's issues with playing in Utah? Wouldn't he be sour if traded here?
I haven't read any issues that Smart wouldn't want to come here. As he stated otherwise publicly?