Trade for Zach Lavine

[Thee Jazz Fan]

Good to hear they like Trey Lyles. They also feel like most of us that Hayward isn't a #1 option but would be a great third option on a great team. They are very bullish on Favors.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ncoloradojazz]

Lavine>>> EXum


Id offer that to see if they would bite I doubt it..

If you can get LAvine for TRey Lyles and Hood then you no doubt have to pull that trigger. Lavine is a true combo guard. Lyles doesn't have a real position and Hood is nice young player but players like him are adime a dozen... Id try get Lavine and then id pull trades to get Jabari since he fits the culture of your city. Honestly Jazz fans you need to strip down most of your team. You got some trade value pieces but the pieces you have are not going to win anything. Not even good enough to get to the conference finals.. Need to strip this team while the players have good trade value.. Get a nice young team and let them grow together. Like OKC did when they first moved to okc. They had a young Durant, Russ, Harden, and Ibaka. All were young learning the pro game together. Got to get players who want to be in Utah also. This is hard since most people don't want to live in Utah. You Mormons love basketball. Timeto get a few on your squad. Id draft that Moore kid From Utah State. I think he will be a good bench player in the league

 

[ncoloradojazz]

people thatthink Hood is better then Lavine is homerism at its best. Every GM in hoops would take Lavine over Hood BTW. Yet Hood is better. Comical

 

[Hotdog]

So, I made an account on a Twolves fan board. Asked them about Lavine, and about trade possibilities. This is the response.



Thoughts?

lol

I just read your post. You spelled alpha, alfa.

How would you know what one is? You don't even know how to spell it.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Cmon Cy. We already made so much progress with this. Don't throw it a way.

Not only are you wrong, about Hood over Lavine, but you choose to use LMAO, as if you are saying it's not close. It's not close the other way.

Think about it. Hood is good player, who isn't dynamic in any way. He doesn't possess the same kind of upside that Lavine does. Lavine is just as a good a shooter, but has far superior athleticism. That matters Cy. You can't say it doesnt. It's often what sets apart good players from great players.

Hood isnt dynamic? He is already one of the best PNR wings in the NBA and can defend positions 1-3. He has shown an increased ability to get to the FT line in the past month too.

I don't have LaVine, but he is a pure scorer and nothing else IMO. I don't think he ever reaches legitimate star status or all-star status. He is going to be a Jamal Crawford type.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

I'm gonna go play and splash around in the Jabari Parker thread. Because it's fun to participate in the wanking of wondering about whether a young player, on a rookie contract, with good upside will somehow be dealt.... even though that ish never happens.

Maybe we can merge these threads? Mods?

Also Hood > LaVine

While youre at it, bump the "trade for Nik Stauskus" thread that probably exist somewhere.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Also, pretty sure LaVine never scored when guarded by Hood last night.

 

[Hotdog]

you are a ****ing moron.

I asked a question about precedent, plain and simple.

you really are a ****ing moron.

hmmm. why would you ask if there is precedent? Is it because you were just curious, or because you were trying to imply that it hasn't been done, therefore it won't be done. We both know it's the latter.

Cmon man. You aren't gonna win arguments with constantly spinning your garbage. You actually believe you can try and pretend you meant something else. It's not going to work on me.

You and I both know what you meant. Stop it.

 

[fishonjazz]

Could have also tossed Burks for Lavine out there. Lavine would have no problem shooting those open 3s Burks passes up.

FWIW per 36 minutes Burks attempts 3.6 three pointers per game and shoots 39% from three.
per 36 minutes Lavine attempts 4.5 three pointers per game and shoots 35.5% from three.

They make about the same amount (burks 1.4 and lavine 1.6)

Lavine also attempts more 2 point shots than alec burks does. Seems that lavine just shoots more in general apparently.
Burks gets to the line quite a bit more though.


Just some food for thought.

 

[fishonjazz]

people thatthink Hood is better then Lavine is homerism at its best. Every GM in hoops would take Lavine over Hood BTW. Yet Hood is better. Comical

That hood is better than lavine right now is simply fact. there is no doubt about it.

Lavine has tons of potential though and might be better in a couple years.

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

lol

I just read your post. You spelled alpha, alfa.

How would you know what one is? You don't even know how to spell it.

Never claimed to be great at spelling, but whatever makes u feel good about your self. U don't have much room to be pointing out my shortcomings. And yes they are vast. I find it funny when people feel the need to correct or point out those kind of errors. Try to find some self confidence and worry about yourself instead of trying to fix me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[NAOS]

hmmm. why would you ask if there is precedent? Is it because you were just curious, or because you were trying to imply that it hasn't been done, therefore it won't be done. We both know it's the latter.

Cmon man. You aren't gonna win arguments with constantly spinning your garbage. You actually believe you can try and pretend you meant something else. It's not going to work on me.

You and I both know what you meant. Stop it.

lol. You're reaching for biggest tool on the internet status.

I asked a question about precedent and you stubbed your tiny weenus on it. Hilarious