What's new
By:

Trade ideas

jom2003 said:
Teams pick and choose all the time and I'm not sure when would it be a bad time to have "too many options". I mean if Keyonte is putting up crazy numbers like Donovan's rookie year then sure, "Hood" can go. But it simply hasn't happened and you are talking like it has.

It didn't hurt Curry's career when he had to share the ball with Monta Ellis. It didn't hurt Luka when DSJ was mavs starting PG coming in and Mavs was able to quickly see the talent that they had and send DSJ packing. If you are talented enough and your team isn't completely ignorant, I don't see how that's a bad thing. I mean we the jazzfans can probably speak from our own experience first hand with this DedEx development project. And how Knicks spent so many years passing up opportunitues to acquire true stars just so they can prioritize the development of RJ Barrett. If Keyonte's good enough then it really doesn't matter who we bring in. It would only motivate him even more to be the best player he can be.
Click to expand...
And now RJ balling, they signed an All-Star PG without giving up assets, and they have a truckload of tradeable assets....
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
And Curry didnt really breakout until later in his career, so he may have been hurt lmfao
Click to expand...
Its exactly why its funny. I think Mark Jackson had as much to do with it as Monta but that team took off once they unloaded Monta.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
And now RJ balling, they signed an All-Star PG without giving up assets, and they have a truckload of tradeable assets....
Click to expand...

Remember when my worst take ever was liking RJ Barrett and you plus other people wouldn’t stop giving me ****? Good times.
 
Looks like Lavine's exit off the court is an indication that the situation has digressed to a point of no return.

If Lavine goes to Lakers and Lakers need a 1st rounder to package to give to Chicago, Maybe we can get Reeves in the package somehow??
 
So I’m starting to think that Lauri-OKC should be a thing we talk about more. If I’m an OKC fan, Lauri is the number one guy I’m talking about.
 
The idea of trading Lauri sucks to begin with....but I'm not sure this FO is ready/willing to put a team around him. He's a star player with one more year left on his deal on a bad team, the vultures are swarming and rightfully so.

I wish I like Giddey more.
 
Just read a Lakers article where they think an offer for Markkanen would happen for 2 unprotected firsts and filler salary. They would have to remove the restri tons on the pick we already have. Add some swaps and still have to include reeves.
 
Chargers Jazz Angels said:
Just read a Lakers article where they think an offer for Markkanen would happen for 2 unprotected firsts and filler salary. They would have to remove the restri tons on the pick we already have. Add some swaps and still have to include reeves.
Click to expand...
How would that even work? They owe their '24 pick to NOP, but NOP can choose to defer to '25, so they can't trade those. They can't trade '26, we have their '27, so they can't trade '28.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top