What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Flc said:
Ya'll think Lakers would have done last night's trade if they knew that Durant was heading to Phoenix?
Click to expand...
I think they should have knowing that. Anytime you can get 3 good players for a protected first you should do imo. They can probably end up trading Deangelo, vando, and beasley for more than 1 protected first if they want to anyway. Especially if those 3 players look even better next to lebron and AD.
 
I was going to keep reading this thread and then looked up and saw i was on page 1,521 and to get caught up I have to get to page 1,555.
Time to skip to the end
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
And I think DA made a mistake not selling someone like JC for 2nds.

2nds have value now that teams are really holding onto first, or actually dont have any because only 1/3rd of the NBA has tradeable first rounders.

Why not get a hoard of 2nd rounders and further the tank?
Click to expand...
Because everyone knows we can't use second rounders. We have way to many firsts to digest as it is. No team is going to accept anything but firsts from the Jazz, just like someone would complain about a 10 dollar tip from Elon Musk.
 
The Jazz Wonderbra said:
No. If the Warriors are dumping Wiseman and Moody its for saving money. They cannot take back anything close to their contracts back. TPEs and or minimum contracts.
Click to expand...
Turns out they traded him for GPII who makes almost as much as Wiseman (although 3M less next year), who has one more year on his contract.
 
www.espn.com

NBA trade grades: Who won the KD blockbuster and every deadline deal?

ESPN NBA Insider Kevin Pelton is handing out grades for the biggest moves, including monster trades for Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving.
www.espn.com www.espn.com

Utah Jazz: A-

Although the Jazz's perspective is most straightforward here -- a team that's rebuilding, despite its surprising success this season, traded three veterans for a large expiring contract and a draft pick in a move that improves its lottery odds -- there are a couple of interesting decisions to unpack.

First, the Jazz were willing to include the Timberwolves in this deal despite having four of their upcoming first-round picks and a swap, starting this June. Presumably, Minnesota feels this trade makes it better this season, hurting a draft pick that belongs to Utah. But the Jazz's long view likely holds that swapping young for old will hurt the Timberwolves down the road, improving the future picks they hold.

Second, and related, was Danny Ainge's apparent eagerness to land a lightly protected (top-4) pick from the Lakers, taking one shot at a midlottery pick rather than trading Beasley, Conley and Vanderbilt separately, which presumably could have yielded a low-end first-rounder or two in addition to some second-rounders in the next couple of drafts. Instead, rebuilding Utah is improbably the team trading away second-round picks to make this deal happen.

Given how many picks Utah already has coming from the Gobert and Donovan Mitchell trades, that high-upside approach makes sense to me, rather than stockpiling increasing numbers of first-rounders.

Nobody would ever compare Ainge's style as a decision-maker to that of former Philadelphia 76ers executive Sam Hinkie. Like Hinkie, however, Ainge has repeatedly shown himself to have the longest view in the room to his teams' benefit.

Besides the pick, the other benefit of this trade for the Jazz is increasing their 2023 cap space. Taking back just one player (Jones) with 2023-24 salary gives Utah $30-plus million in cap space this summer. Extending or re-signing Jordan Clarkson, who is likely to decline his $14.3 million player option, would cut into that. Still, the Jazz should have plenty of room to add salary in exchange for even more draft picks.

As for Westbrook, it's hard to imagine he'll be asked to report to Salt Lake City. A buyout of Westbrook's contract makes sense for both sides, allowing Utah to recoup the salary added in this trade and Westbrook to pick his destination as a free agent.
 
YoungJefe said:
Those two had convinced themselves that Herro, Robinson, Jovic, and a couple of crap picks were all we were going to get.
Click to expand...
Sure... I said we should consider it if NY didn't pony up unprotected picks. Cavs gave us the unprotected picks... If Lauri stayed the Cleveland version of Lauri or the Chicago version of Lauri then the Heat package is still in the ball park. You can't call unprotected Heat picks "crap" and not say the Cav picks aren't "crap" btw.
 
framer said:
Because everyone knows we can't use second rounders. We have way to many firsts to digest as it is. No team is going to accept anything but firsts from the Jazz, just like someone would complain about a 10 dollar tip from Elon Musk.
Click to expand...
Think that could be true to a degree, but at the end of the day if a team wants to move a player they are going to take what they can get and if you are putting up a ton of 2nds that seems to move the needle nowadays.

I mean, if we didnt have teh 2nds we had, we wouldnt have been able to push the deal through that we got done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top