What's new

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

I am here for the draft news, not the internet forum spats, drama, and counseling.

The best advice... mute the guy you don't like. Then it doesn't matter what he says.

Now, we are like 1 week from the draft. Things should start to get real or many of us will be dissapointed.
The ignore button is a helluva tool.
 

I would imagine we are discussing one of three trades with Atlanta:

#1 pro Utah - Rudy for Collins, Hunter and a pick: pretty aggressive. Would we sacrifice the pick to have the luxury savings? What does Atlanta do with Capela?

#2 even deal - Rudy Gobert, Rudy Gay, and NAW for Collins, Capela, Hunter and a pick: seems pretty fair, but we do take on $4 million more in salaries.

#3 pro Atlanta - Rudy and Bojan for Collins, Capela, Hunter and a pick: what a steal for Atlanta here. Probably too rich for our blood.
 
I would imagine we are discussing one of three trades with Atlanta:

#1 pro Utah - Rudy for Collins, Hunter and a pick: pretty aggressive. Would we sacrifice the pick to have the luxury savings? What does Atlanta do with Capela?

#2 even deal - Rudy Gobert, Rudy Gay, and NAW for Collins, Capela, Hunter and a pick: seems pretty fair, but we do take on $4 million more in salaries.

#3 pro Atlanta - Rudy and Bojan for Collins, Capela, Hunter and a pick: what a steal for Atlanta here. Probably too rich for our blood.

I think it‘a closer to #3 than #1 and #2 may be what it ends up.
 
You're probably right.

Me personally, I would rank my preferences as:

#1 with the pick
#1 without the pick
#2
#3
Which one helps Atlanta land Lavine? If there is a trade that helps them get Lavine, then they would be more eager to give things up.
 
I twist words? Seriously?
Yes, absolutely, and you've been told this over and over again, by many people. I am assuming this is not deliberate, and that you don't realize how much you twist other people's words. You should take this as an indication that you need to read other people's posts more carefully and not project your on thoughts onto what they are saying so freely. This is a skill that requires practice.

I asked: "didn't Cy attack me for years?"
You said: "He's gotten pretty frustrated with you, and has crossed the line..". So you blamed me for Cy attacking me for years. That's what you said. Don't twist it.
Cy alone is responsible for his responses to you. As I said, he was the one who crossed the line. I reported him for it once. He has no sympathy from me.

It seems like you've built up some notion that you're a victim somehow. You're not. You're not trapped on JazzFanz, you could be on reddit or RealGM. Instead, you willingly come back for the abuse, and continue to (probably unwittingly) twist what other people are saying, knowing exactly how they will react. You are every bit as much a participant in the exchanges with Cy as Cy is himself.

I responded with " just don't what to tell you. You either saw what Cy did for years or you didn't. His actions are his actions."
I actually reported him for his actions. Cy's actions do not excuse your behavior.

And you twist again - when did I say I was the "center of attention"?
"And if I'm your FoxNews or CNN and you're on the other side, you're going to dislike what I say regardless of what I say."

Your attempt at tu quoque is unimpressive.

I just said that I might trigger some people when I have no intention of triggering anybody.
You're not a trigger, you're the event being responded to.

Please don't say I twist things.
To clear, I only told you what I see. What you do with it is up to you.

However, if you want to discuss this no longer, I'll respect that. You have to develop into the person you want to be in your own fashion.
 
@One Brow

I'm serious when I say I don't look for conflict and I do not want to argue with people here. I do not come here with ill intentions at all.

I will try my best to do better. I promise.

I would like to, and I'm sure many others around here too, move on to more positive conversations about the actual team.
 
Back
Top