Nah, just answer the question.If women were better than men at sports then yes.
Nah, just answer the question.If women were better than men at sports then yes.
Its not the penis obviously lol. Its what comes along with being a male. Males are better at sports than females. This obvious. If you disagree go ahead and google the fastest female sprinter time vs male. most weight lifted by female vs male. Longest distance thrown of a javelin or discus male vs female. Google how fast serena williams can hit a tennis ball vs nadal. Literally anything.What about the someone who is born with both genitalia? Or someone who has what's know as "XX male syndrome," where a person has 2 X, no Y, but still has a penis? Or any one of a myriad of other possibilities that go beyond male/female?
Why, by the way, should the determining factor be a penis or lack thereof? Is the penis in any way important in the sport? Not in many of them, I would suggest.
No would have ever heard of lisa leslie if there wasn't a wnba. She couldn't come close, not even a tiny bit close to playing in the actual in nba. Now i would ask you this question. Why not?I guarantee you, a team of WNBA stars would destroy a team comprised of any 5 of us on this board. Heck, Lisa Leslie alone in her prime could probably beat us 1-on-5.
I did. As of right now i have no problem if women want to compete against men. If women were better than men at sports then I would have an issue. They aren't though so its a straw man question.Nah, just answer the question.
Okay so don't then.I did. As of right now i have no problem if women want to compete against men. If women were better than men at sports then I would have an issue. They aren't though so its a straw man question.
There are sports they are better at. There have been women who are dominate in their sport even compared to men. Off the top of my head I know of long distance runners, divers, ping pong players, and equestrian athletes that dominated even men.I did. As of right now i have no problem if women want to compete against men. If women were better than men at sports then I would have an issue. They aren't though so its a straw man question.
Hey, you're the one who brought up the penis.Its not the penis obviously lol. Its what comes along with being a male. Males are better at sports than females. This obvious. If you disagree go ahead and google the fastest female sprinter time vs male. most weight lifted by female vs male. Longest distance thrown of a javelin or discus male vs female. Google how fast serena williams can hit a tennis ball vs nadal. Literally anything.
I take my daughter to school everyday (she is in kindergarten). We arrive about 10 minutes early so she can play with her classmates on the playground. They play tag often. The girls cant keep up with the boys. They are on different levels of speed even at that age.
Google fastest mile by a man and fastest mile by a woman. I bet the man time is faster. Do 20 miles. 50. Whatever you want. I dont know if there is a way to prove or track male vs female in equestrian or ping pong but if you can show me im all ears. Diving makes sense being that it seems like a smaller splash would make for a better score and women are smaller. Equestrian too i guess. Less weight on the horses back (the horse seems more important than the "athlete" in this sport but idk)There are sports they are better at. There have been women who are dominate in their sport even compared to men. Off the top of my head I know of long distance runners, divers, ping pong players, and equestrian athletes that dominated even men.
How many people would have heard of Kobe Bryant if there wasn't an NBA?No would have ever heard of lisa leslie if there wasn't a wnba. She couldn't come close, not even a tiny bit close to playing in the actual in nba. Now i would ask you this question. Why not?
One mile isn't long distance. Here is a link about how women are better at very long distances and why.Google fastest mile by a man and fastest mile by a woman. I bet the man time is faster. Do 20 miles. 50. Whatever you want. I dont know if there is a way to prove or track male vs female in equestrian or ping pong but if you can show me im all ears. Diving makes sense being that it seems like a smaller splash would make for a better score and women are smaller. Equestrian too i guess. Less weight on the horses back (the horse seems more important than the "athlete" in this sport but idk)
I do know that there is actual factual undeniable data available on many olympic events like shotput, discuss, javelin, any kind of racing, long jump, triple jump etc etc. Men are better in all those things. Why do you think that is?
Edit: I googled fastest marathon time for men and for women. Spoiler alert, the men were dominant.
Because we segregate men and women socially. Why is there a men's wrestling team (as opposed to men's matches and women's matches on a single team)? Same for track, swimming, etc.If they did away with mens and womens teams and simply had a kearns high school basketball team (not a mens and womens team), a kearns high tennis team, soccer team, etc then there would be no women in sports. Why do you think that is?
By the way, you do realize South Park doesn't depict reality, right? Men don't just jump into women's sports willy-nilly, and ********* don't grow on the backs of mice.@One Brow do you think any male (not ones that are transitioning or have transitioned) should be allowed to compete in females sports?
Has that happened anywhere, or are you just fear-mongering?So lets say every sports governing body decides sports should be genderless.
I think that if one sports body decided to go genderless, other sports bodies supporting gendered competition would appear to take their place. Why do you think that would not happen?I think it would suck that my daughter wouldn't have a chance to compete at a high level in any sports.