Dude, he has a wingspan of like, 7'9"!
In all seriousness, I'm one who wishes he'd play a lot more too because I think he's fun to watch.
The world agrees. Good post.
Dude, he has a wingspan of like, 7'9"!
In all seriousness, I'm one who wishes he'd play a lot more too because I think he's fun to watch.
Marv had a double-double (16-11), made all his free throws, and didn't commit a turnover. Kanter matched his score but only grabbed three boards, went 4-6 from the stripe and committed two turnovers. Strange definitions of "great" and "bad" you use.kanter was playing great and marvin was playing bad
Because it didn't REDUCE Kanter's minutes? If you are "taking" minutes you are "reducing" minutes.How is that not an example of marvin taking meaninful minutes from kanter?
Marv had a double-double (16-11), made all his free throws, and didn't commit a turnover. Kanter matched his score but only grabbed three boards, went 4-6 from the stripe and committed two turnovers. Strange definitions of "great" and "bad" you use.
Tonight while the minutes were meaningful (close game in the first half) kanter was playing great and marvin was playing bad, yet marvin got more minutes than kanter in the first half.
And if they trade him (and Jefferson) then there's another 45-50 minutes per game to get some youngsters even more time on the court.Marv had a double-double (16-11), made all his free throws, and didn't commit a turnover. Kanter matched his score but only grabbed three boards, went 4-6 from the stripe and committed two turnovers. Strange definitions of "great" and "bad" you use.
Because it didn't REDUCE Kanter's minutes? If you are "taking" minutes you are "reducing" minutes.
If you are just rebadging the "bench MW" argument, Marv's minutes have been cut already (from averaging 28 mins/g in December to 23 this month) with the extra minutes are going to Hayward (from 34 in Dec to 38 in Jan). Enes' minutes are basically the same (21 to 22). Marvin is actually losing time to Hayward and Kanter.
Its like talking to a brick wall
Marv had a double-double (16-11), made all his free throws, and didn't commit a turnover. Kanter matched his score but only grabbed three boards, went 4-6 from the stripe and committed two turnovers. Strange definitions of "great" and "bad" you use.
The double-double isn't that impressive, Evans and Favors also had one, there were just a lot of missed shots. I'd take Kanter's 16 pts on 6-8 shooting over Williams on 5-10 shooting any day.
Marv wasn't terrible and Kanter wasn't awesome (3 rebounds for the entire game is awesome?). And if you have to say "only look at the first half" you admit you're only telling half the story.Note that i said first half.
Marv was terrible in the FIRST HALF and kanter was awesome..... yet marv played more minutes than kanter in the first half.
Its like talking to a brick wall
Back atcha.So true.
Really? Hollins and Karl belong to the school of bringing youngsters along slowly, and Horny has been riding his vets this season (thought to be a rebuilding/tank year) instead of playing the young talent on the team. I doubt Trey, Alec, Gordo, Favs and Enes would be getting more PT (they'd likely be getting less).I just can't help but think that Hollins, Karl and/or Hornacek would be getting a heck of a lot more out of this lineup and would feature the Core5 better.
Really? Hollins and Karl belong to the school of bringing youngsters along slowly, and Horny has been riding his vets this season (thought to be a rebuilding/tank year) instead of playing the young talent on the team. I doubt Trey, Alec, Gordo, Favs and Enes would be getting more PT (they'd likely be getting less).
Marv wasn't terrible and Kanter wasn't awesome (3 rebounds for the entire game is awesome?). And if you have to say "only look at the first half" you admit you're only telling half the story.